Vulnerability-Lookup

CNVD-2021-25382

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2021-04-07

Title

goliath存在未明漏洞

Description

goliath是一款用于编写API服务器的异步框架。 goliath 1.0.6及之前版本中存在安全漏洞。攻击者可通过发送两次Content-Length标头利用该漏洞进行HTTP请求走私攻击。此外，发现无效的传输编码头被解析为有效的，可用于TE:CL走私攻击。

Severity

中

Formal description

目前厂商暂未发布修复措施解决此安全问题，建议使用此软件的用户随时关注厂商主页或参考网址以获取解决办法： https://rubygems.org/gems/goliath

Reference

https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351

Impacted products

Name
goliath goliath <=1.0.6

Show details on source website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2020-7671"
    }
  },
  "description": "goliath\u662f\u4e00\u6b3e\u7528\u4e8e\u7f16\u5199API\u670d\u52a1\u5668\u7684\u5f02\u6b65\u6846\u67b6\u3002\n\ngoliath 1.0.6\u53ca\u4e4b\u524d\u7248\u672c\u4e2d\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\u3002\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u53ef\u901a\u8fc7\u53d1\u9001\u4e24\u6b21Content-Length\u6807\u5934\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u8fdb\u884cHTTP\u8bf7\u6c42\u8d70\u79c1\u653b\u51fb\u3002\u6b64\u5916\uff0c\u53d1\u73b0\u65e0\u6548\u7684\u4f20\u8f93\u7f16\u7801\u5934\u88ab\u89e3\u6790\u4e3a\u6709\u6548\u7684\uff0c\u53ef\u7528\u4e8eTE:CL\u8d70\u79c1\u653b\u51fb\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u6682\u672a\u53d1\u5e03\u4fee\u590d\u63aa\u65bd\u89e3\u51b3\u6b64\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u5efa\u8bae\u4f7f\u7528\u6b64\u8f6f\u4ef6\u7684\u7528\u6237\u968f\u65f6\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u6216\u53c2\u8003\u7f51\u5740\u4ee5\u83b7\u53d6\u89e3\u51b3\u529e\u6cd5\uff1a\r\nhttps://rubygems.org/gems/goliath",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2021-25382",
  "openTime": "2021-04-07",
  "products": {
    "product": "goliath goliath \u003c=1.0.6"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2020-06-11",
  "title": "goliath\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}

CVE-2020-7671 (GCVE-0-2020-7671)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2020-06-10 15:36 – Updated: 2024-08-04 09:41

Summary

goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks.

Severity

No CVSS data available.

CWE

HTTP Request Smuggling

Assigner

snyk mitre root

References

2 references

URL	Tags
https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2C	x_refsource_MISC
https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136	x_refsource_MISC

Impacted products

1 product

Vendor	Product	Version
n/a	goliath	Affected: All versions including 1.0.6

Show details on NVD website

JSON

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T09:41:01.215Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2C"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "goliath",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "All versions including 1.0.6"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "HTTP Request Smuggling",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2020-06-10T15:36:01.000Z",
        "orgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
        "shortName": "snyk"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351%2C"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "report@snyk.io",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-7671",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "goliath",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "All versions including 1.0.6"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "goliath through 1.0.6 allows request smuggling attacks where goliath is used as a backend and a frontend proxy also being vulnerable. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TE:CL smuggling attacks."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "HTTP Request Smuggling"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351,",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://github.com/postrank-labs/goliath/issues/351,"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUBY-GOLIATH-569136"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
    "assignerShortName": "snyk",
    "cveId": "CVE-2020-7671",
    "datePublished": "2020-06-10T15:36:01.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2020-01-21T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T09:41:01.215Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date	Other

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base model, served locally by ML-Gateway. They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.