GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CNVD-2024-33450

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2024-07-23
VLAI
Title
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865存在未明漏洞
Description
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865是RFC开源的一个网络协议。 RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865存在安全漏洞，攻击者利用该漏洞使用针对MD5响应验证器签名的选择前缀冲突攻击，将任何有效的响应(Access-Accept, Access-Reject或Access-Challenge)修改为任何其他响应。
Severity
高
Formal description

厂商尚未提供漏洞修补方案，请关注厂商主页及时更新： https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865

Reference
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4
Impacted products
Name
IETF RFC 2865
Show details on source website
To clipboard 

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2024-3596"
    }
  },
  "description": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u662fRFC\u5f00\u6e90\u7684\u4e00\u4e2a\u7f51\u7edc\u534f\u8bae\u3002\n\nRADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u5b58\u5728\u5b89\u5168\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u653b\u51fb\u8005\u5229\u7528\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4f7f\u7528\u9488\u5bf9MD5\u54cd\u5e94\u9a8c\u8bc1\u5668\u7b7e\u540d\u7684\u9009\u62e9\u524d\u7f00\u51b2\u7a81\u653b\u51fb\uff0c\u5c06\u4efb\u4f55\u6709\u6548\u7684\u54cd\u5e94(Access-Accept, Access-Reject\u6216Access-Challenge)\u4fee\u6539\u4e3a\u4efb\u4f55\u5176\u4ed6\u54cd\u5e94\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u63d0\u4f9b\u6f0f\u6d1e\u4fee\u8865\u65b9\u6848\uff0c\u8bf7\u5173\u6ce8\u5382\u5546\u4e3b\u9875\u53ca\u65f6\u66f4\u65b0\uff1a\r\nhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2024-33450",
  "openTime": "2024-07-23",
  "products": {
    "product": "IETF RFC 2865"
  },
  "referenceLink": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4",
  "serverity": "\u9ad8",
  "submitTime": "2024-07-23",
  "title": "RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865\u5b58\u5728\u672a\u660e\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.


Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.