CNVD-2025-13070

Vulnerability from cnvd - Published: 2025-06-20
VLAI
Title
D-Link DAP-1562空指针取消引用漏洞
Description
D-Link DAP-1562是中国友讯(D-Link)公司的一款无线网桥。 D-Link DAP-1562存在空指针取消引用漏洞,该漏洞源于HTTP POST Request Handler的函数pure_auth_check对参数a1存在空指针取消引用,目前没有详细的漏洞细节提供。
Severity
Formal description

目前厂商尚未发布升级程序修复该安全问题,详情见厂商官网: https://www.dlink.com/

Reference
https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.298191
Impacted products
Name
D-Link D-Link DAP-1562 1.10
Show details on source website

{
  "cves": {
    "cve": {
      "cveNumber": "CVE-2025-1877",
      "cveUrl": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-1877"
    }
  },
  "description": "D-Link DAP-1562\u662f\u4e2d\u56fd\u53cb\u8baf\uff08D-Link\uff09\u516c\u53f8\u7684\u4e00\u6b3e\u65e0\u7ebf\u7f51\u6865\u3002\n\nD-Link DAP-1562\u5b58\u5728\u7a7a\u6307\u9488\u53d6\u6d88\u5f15\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff0c\u8be5\u6f0f\u6d1e\u6e90\u4e8eHTTP POST Request Handler\u7684\u51fd\u6570pure_auth_check\u5bf9\u53c2\u6570a1\u5b58\u5728\u7a7a\u6307\u9488\u53d6\u6d88\u5f15\u7528\uff0c\u76ee\u524d\u6ca1\u6709\u8be6\u7ec6\u7684\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7ec6\u8282\u63d0\u4f9b\u3002",
  "formalWay": "\u76ee\u524d\u5382\u5546\u5c1a\u672a\u53d1\u5e03\u5347\u7ea7\u7a0b\u5e8f\u4fee\u590d\u8be5\u5b89\u5168\u95ee\u9898\uff0c\u8be6\u60c5\u89c1\u5382\u5546\u5b98\u7f51\uff1a\r\nhttps://www.dlink.com/",
  "isEvent": "\u901a\u7528\u8f6f\u786c\u4ef6\u6f0f\u6d1e",
  "number": "CNVD-2025-13070",
  "openTime": "2025-06-20",
  "products": {
    "product": "D-Link D-Link DAP-1562 1.10"
  },
  "referenceLink": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.298191",
  "serverity": "\u4e2d",
  "submitTime": "2025-03-13",
  "title": "D-Link DAP-1562\u7a7a\u6307\u9488\u53d6\u6d88\u5f15\u7528\u6f0f\u6d1e"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…