cve-2012-1181
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2012-03-19 21:00
Modified
2024-08-06 18:53
Severity ?
Summary
fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a process count higher than the intended limit.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T18:53:35.665Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20120315 Re: CVE-request: apache\u0027s mod-fcgid does not respect configured FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass in VirtualHost",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/2"
          },
          {
            "name": "apache-modfcgid-dos(74181)",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_XF",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74181"
          },
          {
            "name": "DSA-2436",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_DEBIAN",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2436"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615814"
          },
          {
            "name": "52565",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52565"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20120315 CVE-request: apache\u0027s mod-fcgid does not respect configured FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass in VirtualHost",
            "tags": [
              "mailing-list",
              "x_refsource_MLIST",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/15/10"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2010-11-22T00:00:00",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a process count higher than the intended limit."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2017-08-28T12:57:01",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20120315 Re: CVE-request: apache\u0027s mod-fcgid does not respect configured FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass in VirtualHost",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/2"
        },
        {
          "name": "apache-modfcgid-dos(74181)",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_XF"
          ],
          "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74181"
        },
        {
          "name": "DSA-2436",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_DEBIAN"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2436"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615814"
        },
        {
          "name": "52565",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52565"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902"
        },
        {
          "name": "[oss-security] 20120315 CVE-request: apache\u0027s mod-fcgid does not respect configured FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass in VirtualHost",
          "tags": [
            "mailing-list",
            "x_refsource_MLIST"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/15/10"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2012-1181",
    "datePublished": "2012-03-19T21:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2012-02-14T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T18:53:35.665Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": false, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apache:http_server:2.3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"A727D554-21B0-4FD4-8828-51348E9F7C21\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apache:mod_fcgid:2.3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"34A3EE79-BDC3-480F-9BE5-943AAE9E7CBC\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a process count higher than the intended limit.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"fcgid_spawn_ctl.c en el m\\u00f3dulo de mod_fcgid v2.3.6 para el Servidor Apache HTTP no reconoce la directiva FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass para un host virtual, lo que hace que sea m\\u00e1s f\\u00e1cil para los atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\\u00f3n de servicio (consumo de memoria) a trav\\u00e9s de una serie de peticiones HTTP que desencadena un proceso de contar superior al l\\u00edmite previsto.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2012-1181",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T01:36:36.543",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2012-03-19T21:55:01.077",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615814\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2436\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/15/10\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/2\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52565\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74181\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\"}, {\"url\": \"https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615814\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2436\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/15/10\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/2\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52565\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74181\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Patch\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-119\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2012-1181\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2012-03-19T21:55:01.077\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T01:36:36.543\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a process count higher than the intended limit.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"fcgid_spawn_ctl.c en el m\u00f3dulo de mod_fcgid v2.3.6 para el Servidor Apache HTTP no reconoce la directiva FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass para un host virtual, lo que hace que sea m\u00e1s f\u00e1cil para los atacantes remotos causar una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio (consumo de memoria) a trav\u00e9s de una serie de peticiones HTTP que desencadena un proceso de contar superior al l\u00edmite previsto.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":false,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:http_server:2.3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A727D554-21B0-4FD4-8828-51348E9F7C21\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:mod_fcgid:2.3.6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"34A3EE79-BDC3-480F-9BE5-943AAE9E7CBC\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615814\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2436\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/15/10\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/2\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52565\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74181\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615814\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2436\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/15/10\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/2\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52565\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74181\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.