ghsa-jp83-4w56-5w6x
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:48
Modified
2022-05-17 01:48
Details

fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a process count higher than the intended limit.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2012-1181",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-119",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2012-03-19T21:55:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a process count higher than the intended limit.",
   id: "GHSA-jp83-4w56-5w6x",
   modified: "2022-05-17T01:48:25Z",
   published: "2022-05-17T01:48:25Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1181",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74181",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615814",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2436",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/15/10",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/2",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52565",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.