ghsa-jp83-4w56-5w6x
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 01:48
Modified
2022-05-17 01:48
Details
fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a process count higher than the intended limit.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2012-1181", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2012-03-19T21:55:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "fcgid_spawn_ctl.c in the mod_fcgid module 2.3.6 for the Apache HTTP Server does not recognize the FcgidMaxProcessesPerClass directive for a virtual host, which makes it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a series of HTTP requests that triggers a process count higher than the intended limit.", id: "GHSA-jp83-4w56-5w6x", modified: "2022-05-17T01:48:25Z", published: "2022-05-17T01:48:25Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-1181", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74181", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49902", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615814", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2436", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/15/10", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/16/2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52565", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.