cve-2013-6826
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2013-11-19 19:00
Modified
2024-09-16 23:56
Severity ?
Summary
cgi-bin/module//sysmanager/admin/SYSAdminUserDialog in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.5 does not properly validate the csrf_token parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.
References
cve@mitre.orghttp://packetstormsecurity.com/files/123980/fortianalyzer-xsrf.txtExploit
cve@mitre.orghttp://www.securityfocus.com/bid/63663Exploit
Impacted products
n/an/a
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T17:46:23.905Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/123980/fortianalyzer-xsrf.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "63663",
            "tags": [
              "vdb-entry",
              "x_refsource_BID",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/63663"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "cgi-bin/module//sysmanager/admin/SYSAdminUserDialog in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.5 does not properly validate the csrf_token parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2013-11-19T19:00:00Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/123980/fortianalyzer-xsrf.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "63663",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "x_refsource_BID"
          ],
          "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/63663"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2013-6826",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "n/a",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "n/a"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "cgi-bin/module//sysmanager/admin/SYSAdminUserDialog in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.5 does not properly validate the csrf_token parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "n/a"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/123980/fortianalyzer-xsrf.txt",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/123980/fortianalyzer-xsrf.txt"
            },
            {
              "name": "63663",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/63663"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2013-6826",
    "datePublished": "2013-11-19T19:00:00Z",
    "dateReserved": "2013-11-19T00:00:00Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-09-16T23:56:53.683Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2013-6826\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2013-11-20T14:12:31.070\",\"lastModified\":\"2013-11-20T17:10:44.207\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"cgi-bin/module//sysmanager/admin/SYSAdminUserDialog in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer before 5.0.5 does not properly validate the csrf_token parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"cgi-bin/module/sysmanager/admin/SYSAdminUserDialog en Fortinet FortiAnalyzer anterior a la versi\u00f3n 5.0.5 no valida adecuadamente el par\u00e1metro csrf_token, lo que permite a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de CSRF.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"baseScore\":6.8},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":true}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-352\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"operator\":\"AND\",\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:fortinet:fortianalyzer_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"5.0.4\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"93A2AD3B-02DC-48AC-9A76-7CB8854E52C1\"}]},{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:fortinet:fortianalyzer-1000d:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"646FBB7D-FB82-491E-8C03-E0D129B7A040\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:fortinet:fortianalyzer-2000b:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8C066180-4970-46F3-86E5-EFE53FBE58FB\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:fortinet:fortianalyzer-200d:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F4962F12-7C53-4BAD-B6BD-A478AC398A84\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:fortinet:fortianalyzer-3000d:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"73A52694-D20A-4D42-B33F-3C7623BF800B\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:fortinet:fortianalyzer-300d:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9FCB9155-75A9-413C-B660-DD21D52F889A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:h:fortinet:fortianalyzer-4000b:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"BA710178-3B33-44FA-8560-08CC0362188E\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/123980/fortianalyzer-xsrf.txt\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/63663\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.