CVE-2016-9122 (GCVE-0-2016-9122)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2017-03-28 02:46 – Updated: 2024-08-06 02:42
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Summary
go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated.
Severity
7.5 (High)
CWE
- Cryptographic Issue
Assigner
References
3 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://hackerone.com/reports/169629 | x_refsource_MISC |
| https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656ad… | x_refsource_MISC |
| http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1 | x_refsource_MISC |
Impacted products
1 product
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4 |
Affected:
Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4
|
Date Public
2017-03-27 00:00
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:42:10.637Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4",
"vendor": "n/a",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4"
}
]
}
],
"datePublic": "2017-03-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"description": "Cryptographic Issue",
"lang": "en",
"type": "text"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2017-03-28T02:57:01.000Z",
"orgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"shortName": "hackerone"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
},
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
}
],
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "support@hackerone.com",
"ID": "CVE-2016-9122",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "Go JOSE All versions before 1.0.4"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Cryptographic Issue"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
},
{
"name": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
},
{
"name": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "36234546-b8fa-4601-9d6f-f4e334aa8ea1",
"assignerShortName": "hackerone",
"cveId": "CVE-2016-9122",
"datePublished": "2017-03-28T02:46:00.000Z",
"dateReserved": "2016-10-31T00:00:00.000Z",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-06T02:42:10.637Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2016-9122",
"date": "2026-11-13",
"epss": "0.01969",
"percentile": "0.80722"
},
"fkie_nvd": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:go-jose_project:go-jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "461700A0-1ABE-4A30-9C79-80C835D8B62E",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.0.3",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "go-jose en versiones anteriores a 1.0.4 sufre de la explotaci\u00f3n de m\u00faltiples firmas. La librer\u00eda go-jose soporta mensajes con varias firmas. Sin embargo, al validar un mensaje firmado el API no indic\u00f3 qu\u00e9 firma era v\u00e1lida, lo que podr\u00eda conducir a confusi\u00f3n. Por ejemplo, los usuarios de la biblioteca pueden leer de forma err\u00f3nea valores de cabecera protegidos de una firma adjunta que era diferente de la validada originalmente."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2016-9122",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:00:39.583",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2017-03-28T02:59:00.260",
"references": [
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
},
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
},
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-284"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:go-jose_project:go-jose:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "461700A0-1ABE-4A30-9C79-80C835D8B62E",
"versionEndIncluding": "1.0.3",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from multiple signatures exploitation. The go-jose library supports messages with multiple signatures. However, when validating a signed message the API did not indicate which signature was valid, which could potentially lead to confusion. For example, users of the library might mistakenly read protected header values from an attached signature that was different from the one originally validated."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "go-jose en versiones anteriores a 1.0.4 sufre de la explotaci\u00f3n de m\u00faltiples firmas. La librer\u00eda go-jose soporta mensajes con varias firmas. Sin embargo, al validar un mensaje firmado el API no indic\u00f3 qu\u00e9 firma era v\u00e1lida, lo que podr\u00eda conducir a confusi\u00f3n. Por ejemplo, los usuarios de la biblioteca pueden leer de forma err\u00f3nea valores de cabecera protegidos de una firma adjunta que era diferente de la validada originalmente."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2016-9122",
"lastModified": "2026-05-13T00:24:29.033",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV30": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 7.5,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 3.6,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2017-03-28T02:59:00.260",
"references": [
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
},
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
},
{
"source": "support@hackerone.com",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/1"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Issue Tracking",
"Patch",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://github.com/square/go-jose/commit/2c5656adca9909843c4ff50acf1d2cf8f32da7e6"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required"
],
"url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/169629"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "support@hackerone.com",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-284"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.