cve-2019-11775
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2019-07-30 13:45
Modified
2024-08-04 23:03
Severity ?
Summary
All builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15 contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems.
References
emo@eclipse.orghttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2494Third Party Advisory
emo@eclipse.orghttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2495Third Party Advisory
emo@eclipse.orghttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2585Third Party Advisory
emo@eclipse.orghttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2590Third Party Advisory
emo@eclipse.orghttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2592Third Party Advisory
emo@eclipse.orghttps://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2737Third Party Advisory
emo@eclipse.orghttps://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549601Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
The Eclipse FoundationEclipse OpenJ9
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T23:03:32.862Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549601"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2019:2494",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2494"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2019:2495",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2495"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2019:2585",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2585"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2019:2590",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2590"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2019:2592",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2592"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2019:2737",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_refsource_REDHAT",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2737"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "Eclipse OpenJ9",
          "vendor": "The Eclipse Foundation",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "0.15.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "unspecified",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "All builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15 contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-367",
              "description": "CWE-367",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2019-09-11T18:06:15",
        "orgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
        "shortName": "eclipse"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549601"
        },
        {
          "name": "RHSA-2019:2494",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2494"
        },
        {
          "name": "RHSA-2019:2495",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2495"
        },
        {
          "name": "RHSA-2019:2585",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2585"
        },
        {
          "name": "RHSA-2019:2590",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2590"
        },
        {
          "name": "RHSA-2019:2592",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2592"
        },
        {
          "name": "RHSA-2019:2737",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory",
            "x_refsource_REDHAT"
          ],
          "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2737"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security@eclipse.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2019-11775",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "Eclipse OpenJ9",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_affected": "\u003c",
                            "version_value": "0.15.0"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "The Eclipse Foundation"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "All builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15 contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-367"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549601",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "url": "https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549601"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2019:2494",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2494"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2019:2495",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2495"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2019:2585",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2585"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2019:2590",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2590"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2019:2592",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2592"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2019:2737",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2737"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c",
    "assignerShortName": "eclipse",
    "cveId": "CVE-2019-11775",
    "datePublished": "2019-07-30T13:45:38",
    "dateReserved": "2019-05-06T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T23:03:32.862Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2019-11775\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"published\":\"2019-07-30T14:15:14.780\",\"lastModified\":\"2020-10-08T14:46:51.233\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"All builds of Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to 0.15 contain a bug where the loop versioner may fail to privatize a value that is pulled out of the loop by versioning - for example if there is a condition that is moved out of the loop that reads a field we may not privatize the value of that field in the modified copy of the loop allowing the test to see one value of the field and subsequently the loop to see a modified field value without retesting the condition moved out of the loop. This can lead to a variety of different issues but read out of array bounds is one major consequence of these problems.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Todas las compilaciones de OpenJ9 de Eclipse anteriores a versi\u00f3n 0.15, contienen un bug donde el versionador  de bucle puede fallar al privatizar un valor que se extrae del bucle mediante el versionado \u2013 por ejemplo, si hay una condici\u00f3n que es movida fuera del bucle que lee un campo no podemos privatizar el valor de ese campo en la copia modificada del bucle permitiendo a la prueba visualizar un valor del campo y posteriormente el bucle para visualizar un valor del campo modificado sin volver a probar la condici\u00f3n movida fuera del bucle. Esto puede conllevar a una variedad de problemas diferentes, pero la lectura fuera de l\u00edmites de la matriz es una consecuencia importante de estos problemas.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":7.4,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":5.2}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:P\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"baseScore\":5.8},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":4.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-367\"}]},{\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-367\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:eclipse:openj9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"0.15.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8216721A-F120-418A-9E13-19A1D8DF1BAD\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite:5.8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F4F86C3C-B99C-44C6-97D7-163DC3F59687\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"EE249E1B-A1FD-4E08-AA71-A0E1F10FFE97\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"33C068A4-3780-4EAB-A937-6082DF847564\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9BBCD86A-E6C7-4444-9D74-F861084090F0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_server:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"51EF4996-72F4-4FA4-814F-F5991E7A8318\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:6.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E5ED5807-55B7-47C5-97A6-03233F4FBC3A\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux_workstation:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"825ECE2D-E232-46E0-A047-074B34DB1E97\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2494\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2495\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2585\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2590\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2592\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2737\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=549601\",\"source\":\"emo@eclipse.org\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.