cve-2019-7309
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2019-02-03 02:00
Modified
2024-08-04 20:46
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
0.08% (0.37943)
Summary
In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, the memcmp function for the x32 architecture can incorrectly return zero (indicating that the inputs are equal) because the RDX most significant bit is mishandled.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website


{
   containers: {
      adp: [
         {
            providerMetadata: {
               dateUpdated: "2024-08-04T20:46:46.043Z",
               orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
               shortName: "CVE",
            },
            references: [
               {
                  name: "106835",
                  tags: [
                     "vdb-entry",
                     "x_refsource_BID",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106835",
               },
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_refsource_MISC",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24155",
               },
               {
                  tags: [
                     "x_refsource_MISC",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00041.html",
               },
               {
                  name: "GLSA-202006-04",
                  tags: [
                     "vendor-advisory",
                     "x_refsource_GENTOO",
                     "x_transferred",
                  ],
                  url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04",
               },
            ],
            title: "CVE Program Container",
         },
      ],
      cna: {
         affected: [
            {
               product: "n/a",
               vendor: "n/a",
               versions: [
                  {
                     status: "affected",
                     version: "n/a",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         datePublic: "2019-02-02T00:00:00",
         descriptions: [
            {
               lang: "en",
               value: "In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, the memcmp function for the x32 architecture can incorrectly return zero (indicating that the inputs are equal) because the RDX most significant bit is mishandled.",
            },
         ],
         problemTypes: [
            {
               descriptions: [
                  {
                     description: "n/a",
                     lang: "en",
                     type: "text",
                  },
               ],
            },
         ],
         providerMetadata: {
            dateUpdated: "2020-06-13T02:06:34",
            orgId: "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
            shortName: "mitre",
         },
         references: [
            {
               name: "106835",
               tags: [
                  "vdb-entry",
                  "x_refsource_BID",
               ],
               url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106835",
            },
            {
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24155",
            },
            {
               tags: [
                  "x_refsource_MISC",
               ],
               url: "https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00041.html",
            },
            {
               name: "GLSA-202006-04",
               tags: [
                  "vendor-advisory",
                  "x_refsource_GENTOO",
               ],
               url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04",
            },
         ],
         x_legacyV4Record: {
            CVE_data_meta: {
               ASSIGNER: "cve@mitre.org",
               ID: "CVE-2019-7309",
               STATE: "PUBLIC",
            },
            affects: {
               vendor: {
                  vendor_data: [
                     {
                        product: {
                           product_data: [
                              {
                                 product_name: "n/a",
                                 version: {
                                    version_data: [
                                       {
                                          version_value: "n/a",
                                       },
                                    ],
                                 },
                              },
                           ],
                        },
                        vendor_name: "n/a",
                     },
                  ],
               },
            },
            data_format: "MITRE",
            data_type: "CVE",
            data_version: "4.0",
            description: {
               description_data: [
                  {
                     lang: "eng",
                     value: "In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, the memcmp function for the x32 architecture can incorrectly return zero (indicating that the inputs are equal) because the RDX most significant bit is mishandled.",
                  },
               ],
            },
            problemtype: {
               problemtype_data: [
                  {
                     description: [
                        {
                           lang: "eng",
                           value: "n/a",
                        },
                     ],
                  },
               ],
            },
            references: {
               reference_data: [
                  {
                     name: "106835",
                     refsource: "BID",
                     url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106835",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24155",
                     refsource: "MISC",
                     url: "https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24155",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00041.html",
                     refsource: "MISC",
                     url: "https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00041.html",
                  },
                  {
                     name: "GLSA-202006-04",
                     refsource: "GENTOO",
                     url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04",
                  },
               ],
            },
         },
      },
   },
   cveMetadata: {
      assignerOrgId: "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
      assignerShortName: "mitre",
      cveId: "CVE-2019-7309",
      datePublished: "2019-02-03T02:00:00",
      dateReserved: "2019-02-02T00:00:00",
      dateUpdated: "2024-08-04T20:46:46.043Z",
      state: "PUBLISHED",
   },
   dataType: "CVE_RECORD",
   dataVersion: "5.1",
   "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
      nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2019-7309\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2019-02-03T02:29:00.237\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T04:47:58.757\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"In the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.29, the memcmp function for the x32 architecture can incorrectly return zero (indicating that the inputs are equal) because the RDX most significant bit is mishandled.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"En GNU C Library (también conocido como glibc o libc6), hasta la versión 2.29, la función memcmp para la arquitectura x32 puede devolver cero (indicando que las entradas son iguales) de manera incorrecta debido a que el bit de RDX más significativo se gestiona incorrectamente.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV30\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":5.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":2.1,\"accessVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"NVD-CWE-noinfo\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:gnu:glibc:*:*:*:*:*:*:x86:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"2.29\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"90936868-EB88-41E3-A01D-D5F469CE46C3\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106835\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24155\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00041.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106835\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\",\"VDB Entry\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202006-04\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24155\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-02/msg00041.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}",
   },
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.