cve-2020-25685
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-01-20 00:00
Modified
2024-08-04 15:40
Severity ?
Summary
A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1 when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889688Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QGB7HL3OWHTLEPSMLDGOMXQKG3KM2QME/
secalert@redhat.comhttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WYW3IR6APUSKOYKL5FT3ACTIHWHGQY32/
secalert@redhat.comhttps://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-17Third Party Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12135-security-advisory-61Third Party Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4844Third Party Advisory
secalert@redhat.comhttps://www.jsof-tech.com/disclosures/dnspooq/Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
n/adnsmasq
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T15:40:36.614Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.jsof-tech.com/disclosures/dnspooq/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889688"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2021-84440e87ba",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WYW3IR6APUSKOYKL5FT3ACTIHWHGQY32/"
          },
          {
            "name": "GLSA-202101-17",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-17"
          },
          {
            "name": "DSA-4844",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4844"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2021-2e4c3d5a9d",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QGB7HL3OWHTLEPSMLDGOMXQKG3KM2QME/"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12135-security-advisory-61"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "dnsmasq",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "dnsmasq 2.83"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1 when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-326",
              "description": "CWE-326",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2022-10-07T00:00:00",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://www.jsof-tech.com/disclosures/dnspooq/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889688"
        },
        {
          "name": "FEDORA-2021-84440e87ba",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WYW3IR6APUSKOYKL5FT3ACTIHWHGQY32/"
        },
        {
          "name": "GLSA-202101-17",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-17"
        },
        {
          "name": "DSA-4844",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4844"
        },
        {
          "name": "FEDORA-2021-2e4c3d5a9d",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QGB7HL3OWHTLEPSMLDGOMXQKG3KM2QME/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12135-security-advisory-61"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2020-25685",
    "datePublished": "2021-01-20T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2020-09-16T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T15:40:36.614Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2020-25685\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2021-01-20T16:15:14.303\",\"lastModified\":\"2023-11-07T03:20:22.197\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A flaw was found in dnsmasq before version 2.83. When getting a reply from a forwarded query, dnsmasq checks in forward.c:reply_query(), which is the forwarded query that matches the reply, by only using a weak hash of the query name. Due to the weak hash (CRC32 when dnsmasq is compiled without DNSSEC, SHA-1 when it is) this flaw allows an off-path attacker to find several different domains all having the same hash, substantially reducing the number of attempts they would have to perform to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This is in contrast with RFC5452, which specifies that the query name is one of the attributes of a query that must be used to match a reply. This flaw could be abused to perform a DNS Cache Poisoning attack. If chained with CVE-2020-25684 the attack complexity of a successful attack is reduced. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se encontr\u00f3 un fallo en dnsmasq versiones anteriores a 2.83.\u0026#xa0;Al obtener una respuesta de una consulta reenviada, dnsmasq comprueba en forward.c:reply_query(), que es la consulta reenviada que coincide con la respuesta, usando solo un hash d\u00e9bil del nombre de la consulta.\u0026#xa0;Debido al hash d\u00e9bil (CRC32 cuando dnsmasq se compila sin DNSSEC, SHA-1 cuando lo es), este fallo permite a un atacante fuera de ruta encontrar varios dominios diferentes que tengan el mismo hash, reduciendo sustancialmente el n\u00famero de intentos que tendr\u00edan que realizar para falsificar una respuesta y conseguir que dnsmasq la acepte.\u0026#xa0;Esto contrasta con RFC5452, que especifica que el nombre de la consulta es uno de los atributos de una consulta que debe ser usada para hacer coincidir una respuesta.\u0026#xa0;Se puede abusar de este fallo para realizar un ataque de envenenamiento de cach\u00e9 de DNS.\u0026#xa0;Si se encadena con CVE-2020-25684, se reduce la complejidad del ataque de un ataque con \u00e9xito\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":3.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":4.3},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":8.6,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-326\"}]},{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-326\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:thekelleys:dnsmasq:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.83\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F38115DF-0F5C-442D-83D4-1125AAB4E2B7\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:32:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"36D96259-24BD-44E2-96D9-78CE1D41F956\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:33:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"E460AA51-FCDA-46B9-AE97-E6676AA5E194\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"07B237A9-69A3-4A9C-9DA0-4E06BD37AE73\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:arista:eos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.21\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.21.14m\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"2E5C0DA1-5E51-40F1-82FE-CF7E391C07E4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:arista:eos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.22\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.22.9m\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"206E795F-BFE9-4AB9-A35F-60AC911F38E4\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:arista:eos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.23\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.23.7m\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"6FA15712-F804-4060-99C0-7370D6111B83\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:arista:eos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.24\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.24.5m\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"21A321F5-CB56-4258-BB30-6753EECB89DD\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:arista:eos:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"4.25\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.25.2f\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9445AF76-6AE4-46A6-A470-979ADBB19EE2\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889688\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QGB7HL3OWHTLEPSMLDGOMXQKG3KM2QME/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WYW3IR6APUSKOYKL5FT3ACTIHWHGQY32/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202101-17\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12135-security-advisory-61\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4844\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://www.jsof-tech.com/disclosures/dnspooq/\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.