CVE-2021-3470 (GCVE-0-2021-3470)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2021-03-31 13:44 – Updated: 2024-08-03 16:53
VLAI?
Summary
A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc's malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a redis Affected: redis 5.0.10, redis 6.0.9, redis 6.2.0
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T16:53:17.725Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "redis",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "redis 5.0.10, redis 6.0.9, redis 6.2.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc\u0027s malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-119",
              "description": "CWE-119",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2021-03-31T13:44:13",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2021-3470",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "redis",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "redis 5.0.10, redis 6.0.9, redis 6.2.0"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc\u0027s malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-119"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2021-3470",
    "datePublished": "2021-03-31T13:44:13",
    "dateReserved": "2021-03-26T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T16:53:17.725Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"5.0.10\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"5016C2D8-D4B2-414C-802F-7BDD3F7D3EA0\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"6.0.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.0.9\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"0E9C8D2F-1A31-4590-8D0A-649F12BE0F12\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"29F3AA59-B998-425A-B8F3-D5D1E3EC6040\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"5D60A9F7-0EC8-415C-ABB7-9A997C72EEE2\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"1E0C28B7-B676-4F58-89F2-91163181D15B\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc\u0027s malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Se encontr\\u00f3 un problema de desbordamiento de pila en Redis en las versiones anteriores a 5.0.10, versiones anteriores a 6.0.9 y versiones anteriores a 6.2.0, cuando se usaba un asignador de pila que no fuera jemalloc o malloc de glibc, conllevando a un posible bloqueo del proceso o de escritura fuera de l\\u00edmites.\u0026#xa0;Efectivamente, este fallo no afecta a la gran mayor\\u00eda de usuarios que usan jemalloc o glibc malloc.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2021-3470",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:21:37.290",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\", \"baseScore\": 5.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 1.4}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2021-03-31T14:15:20.937",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-119\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-787\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-3470\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2021-03-31T14:15:20.937\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:21:37.290\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc\u0027s malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se encontr\u00f3 un problema de desbordamiento de pila en Redis en las versiones anteriores a 5.0.10, versiones anteriores a 6.0.9 y versiones anteriores a 6.2.0, cuando se usaba un asignador de pila que no fuera jemalloc o malloc de glibc, conllevando a un posible bloqueo del proceso o de escritura fuera de l\u00edmites.\u0026#xa0;Efectivamente, este fallo no afecta a la gran mayor\u00eda de usuarios que usan jemalloc o glibc malloc.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"5.0.10\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5016C2D8-D4B2-414C-802F-7BDD3F7D3EA0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.0.9\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0E9C8D2F-1A31-4590-8D0A-649F12BE0F12\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"29F3AA59-B998-425A-B8F3-D5D1E3EC6040\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5D60A9F7-0EC8-415C-ABB7-9A997C72EEE2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1E0C28B7-B676-4F58-89F2-91163181D15B\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.