cve-2021-3470
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-03-31 13:44
Modified
2024-08-03 16:53
Severity ?
Summary
A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc's malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc.
References
secalert@redhat.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623Issue Tracking, Patch, Third Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
Show details on NVD website

To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T16:53:17.725Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_MISC",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "redis",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "redis 5.0.10, redis 6.0.9, redis 6.2.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc\u0027s malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-119",
              "description": "CWE-119",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2021-03-31T13:44:13",
        "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
        "shortName": "redhat"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_MISC"
          ],
          "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623"
        }
      ],
      "x_legacyV4Record": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "secalert@redhat.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2021-3470",
          "STATE": "PUBLIC"
        },
        "affects": {
          "vendor": {
            "vendor_data": [
              {
                "product": {
                  "product_data": [
                    {
                      "product_name": "redis",
                      "version": {
                        "version_data": [
                          {
                            "version_value": "redis 5.0.10, redis 6.0.9, redis 6.2.0"
                          }
                        ]
                      }
                    }
                  ]
                },
                "vendor_name": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "eng",
              "value": "A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc\u0027s malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "eng",
                  "value": "CWE-119"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623"
            }
          ]
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749",
    "assignerShortName": "redhat",
    "cveId": "CVE-2021-3470",
    "datePublished": "2021-03-31T13:44:13",
    "dateReserved": "2021-03-26T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T16:53:17.725Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"5.0.10\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"5016C2D8-D4B2-414C-802F-7BDD3F7D3EA0\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"6.0.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"6.0.9\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"0E9C8D2F-1A31-4590-8D0A-649F12BE0F12\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"29F3AA59-B998-425A-B8F3-D5D1E3EC6040\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"5D60A9F7-0EC8-415C-ABB7-9A997C72EEE2\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"1E0C28B7-B676-4F58-89F2-91163181D15B\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc\u0027s malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Se encontr\\u00f3 un problema de desbordamiento de pila en Redis en las versiones anteriores a 5.0.10, versiones anteriores a 6.0.9 y versiones anteriores a 6.2.0, cuando se usaba un asignador de pila que no fuera jemalloc o malloc de glibc, conllevando a un posible bloqueo del proceso o de escritura fuera de l\\u00edmites.\u0026#xa0;Efectivamente, este fallo no afecta a la gran mayor\\u00eda de usuarios que usan jemalloc o glibc malloc.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2021-3470",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:21:37.290",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\", \"baseScore\": 5.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"LOW\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 1.4}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 5.0, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 2.9, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}",
      "published": "2021-03-31T14:15:20.937",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Patch\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-119\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-787\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-3470\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2021-03-31T14:15:20.937\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:21:37.290\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A heap overflow issue was found in Redis in versions before 5.0.10, before 6.0.9 and before 6.2.0 when using a heap allocator other than jemalloc or glibc\u0027s malloc, leading to potential out of bound write or process crash. Effectively this flaw does not affect the vast majority of users, who use jemalloc or glibc malloc.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se encontr\u00f3 un problema de desbordamiento de pila en Redis en las versiones anteriores a 5.0.10, versiones anteriores a 6.0.9 y versiones anteriores a 6.2.0, cuando se usaba un asignador de pila que no fuera jemalloc o malloc de glibc, conllevando a un posible bloqueo del proceso o de escritura fuera de l\u00edmites.\u0026#xa0;Efectivamente, este fallo no afecta a la gran mayor\u00eda de usuarios que usan jemalloc o glibc malloc.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"LOW\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P\",\"baseScore\":5.0,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-119\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"5.0.10\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5016C2D8-D4B2-414C-802F-7BDD3F7D3EA0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"6.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"6.0.9\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"0E9C8D2F-1A31-4590-8D0A-649F12BE0F12\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"29F3AA59-B998-425A-B8F3-D5D1E3EC6040\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5D60A9F7-0EC8-415C-ABB7-9A997C72EEE2\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redislabs:redis:6.2.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"1E0C28B7-B676-4F58-89F2-91163181D15B\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943623\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Patch\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.