cve-2021-35936
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-08-16 07:25
Modified
2024-08-04 00:40
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
No Authentication on Logging Server
References
| ▼ | URL | Tags | |
|---|---|---|---|
| security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
| ▼ | Vendor | Product |
|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Airflow |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T00:40:47.453Z",
"orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"shortName": "CVE"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC",
"x_transferred"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E"
}
],
"title": "CVE Program Container"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"product": "Apache Airflow",
"vendor": "Apache Software Foundation",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.1.2",
"status": "affected",
"version": "Apache Airflow",
"versionType": "custom"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Apache Airflow would like to thank Dolev Farhi for reporting this issue."
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow \u003c 2.1.2."
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-200",
"description": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2021-08-16T07:25:11",
"orgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"shortName": "apache"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"x_refsource_MISC"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "No Authentication on Logging Server",
"workarounds": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Use remote logging with GCS, S3, Elasticsearch etc. This is recommended for production environments.\n\nAnd do not publicly expose any other ports apart from Webserver port, Flower port etc."
}
],
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"x_legacyV4Record": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "security@apache.org",
"ID": "CVE-2021-35936",
"STATE": "PUBLIC",
"TITLE": "No Authentication on Logging Server"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "Apache Airflow",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "Apache Airflow",
"version_value": "2.1.2"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Apache Software Foundation"
}
]
}
},
"credit": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Apache Airflow would like to thank Dolev Farhi for reporting this issue."
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow \u003c 2.1.2."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.0.9"
},
"impact": [
{}
],
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"work_around": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Use remote logging with GCS, S3, Elasticsearch etc. This is recommended for production environments.\n\nAnd do not publicly expose any other ports apart from Webserver port, Flower port etc."
}
]
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09",
"assignerShortName": "apache",
"cveId": "CVE-2021-35936",
"datePublished": "2021-08-16T07:25:11",
"dateReserved": "2021-06-29T00:00:00",
"dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T00:40:47.453Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.1",
"meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-35936\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2021-08-16T08:15:11.530\",\"lastModified\":\"2022-10-07T20:22:24.763\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"If remote logging is not used, the worker (in the case of CeleryExecutor) or the scheduler (in the case of LocalExecutor) runs a Flask logging server and is listening on a specific port and also binds on 0.0.0.0 by default. This logging server had no authentication and allows reading log files of DAG jobs. This issue affects Apache Airflow \u003c 2.1.2.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Si no es usado el registro remoto, el trabajador (en el caso de CeleryExecutor) o el planificador (en el caso de LocalExecutor) ejecuta un servidor de registro Flask y est\u00e1 escuchando en un puerto espec\u00edfico y tambi\u00e9n se vincula en 0.0.0.0 por defecto. Este servidor de registro no presenta autenticaci\u00f3n y permite leer los archivos de registro de los trabajos DAG. Este problema afecta a Apache Airflow versiones anteriores a 2.1.2.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":5.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"baseScore\":5.0},\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-306\"}]},{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-200\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:airflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.1.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"410C1DAD-EE40-4F94-8DF6-25B94961F5FD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r53d6bd7b0a66f92ddaf1313282f10fec802e71246606dd30c16536df%40%3Cusers.airflow.apache.org%3E\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
}
}
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.