cve-2021-45953
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2021-12-31 23:52
Modified
2024-08-04 04:54
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 "do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.
References
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:54:31.143Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "n/a", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "n/a" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor\u0027s position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "description": "n/a", "lang": "en", "type": "text" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2022-02-19T21:14:04", "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "shortName": "mitre" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html" }, { "tags": [ "x_refsource_MISC" ], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html" } ], "tags": [ "disputed" ], "x_legacyV4Record": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2021-45953", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "** DISPUTED ** Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor\u0027s position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\"" } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml" }, { "name": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858" }, { "name": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html" }, { "name": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html" } ] } } } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca", "assignerShortName": "mitre", "cveId": "CVE-2021-45953", "datePublished": "2021-12-31T23:52:10", "dateReserved": "2021-12-31T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-04T04:54:31.143Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "fkie_nvd": { "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:thekelleys:dnsmasq:2.86:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"8F823B95-CBE5-4597-9DEE-8E9B833940A7\"}]}]}]", "cveTags": "[{\"sourceIdentifier\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"disputed\"]}]", "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor\u0027s position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \\\"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"** EN DISPUTA ** Dnsmasq versi\\u00f3n 2.86 presenta un desbordamiento de buffer en la regi\\u00f3n heap de la memoria en la funci\\u00f3n extract_name (llamado desde hash_questions y fuzz_util.c). NOTA: la posici\\u00f3n del proveedor es que CVE-2021-45951 a CVE-2021-45957 \\\"no representan vulnerabilidades reales, seg\\u00fan nuestro conocimiento\\\"\\n\"}]", "id": "CVE-2021-45953", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:33:21.113", "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 9.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 5.9}], \"cvssMetricV2\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"accessVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"accessComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"authentication\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"integrityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"PARTIAL\"}, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"exploitabilityScore\": 10.0, \"impactScore\": 6.4, \"acInsufInfo\": false, \"obtainAllPrivilege\": false, \"obtainUserPrivilege\": false, \"obtainOtherPrivilege\": false, \"userInteractionRequired\": false}]}", "published": "2022-01-01T00:15:08.593", "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Exploit\", \"Issue Tracking\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Third Party Advisory\"]}]", "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-787\"}]}]" }, "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2021-45953\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2022-01-01T00:15:08.593\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:33:21.113\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[{\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"disputed\"]}],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor\u0027s position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \\\"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"** EN DISPUTA ** Dnsmasq versi\u00f3n 2.86 presenta un desbordamiento de buffer en la regi\u00f3n heap de la memoria en la funci\u00f3n extract_name (llamado desde hash_questions y fuzz_util.c). NOTA: la posici\u00f3n del proveedor es que CVE-2021-45951 a CVE-2021-45957 \\\"no representan vulnerabilidades reales, seg\u00fan nuestro conocimiento\\\"\\n\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":9.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":5.9}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitabilityScore\":10.0,\"impactScore\":6.4,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-787\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:thekelleys:dnsmasq:2.86:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"8F823B95-CBE5-4597-9DEE-8E9B833940A7\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Exploit\",\"Issue Tracking\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Third Party Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.