gsd-2021-45953
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:23
Details
** DISPUTED ** Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor's position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 "do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge."
Aliases
Aliases
{ "GSD": { "alias": "CVE-2021-45953", "description": "Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c).", "id": "GSD-2021-45953", "references": [ "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-45953.html" ] }, "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2021-45953" ], "details": "** DISPUTED ** Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor\u0027s position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\"", "id": "GSD-2021-45953", "modified": "2023-12-13T01:23:19.995195Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org", "ID": "CVE-2021-45953", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "n/a", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_value": "n/a" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "n/a" } ] } }, "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "** DISPUTED ** Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor\u0027s position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge.\"" } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "n/a" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml" }, { "name": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858" }, { "name": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html" }, { "name": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html" } ] } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "cve": { "configurations": [ { "nodes": [ { "cpeMatch": [ { "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:thekelleys:dnsmasq:2.86:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "8F823B95-CBE5-4597-9DEE-8E9B833940A7", "vulnerable": true } ], "negate": false, "operator": "OR" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Dnsmasq 2.86 has a heap-based buffer overflow in extract_name (called from hash_questions and fuzz_util.c). NOTE: the vendor\u0027s position is that CVE-2021-45951 through CVE-2021-45957 \"do not represent real vulnerabilities, to the best of our knowledge." }, { "lang": "es", "value": "** EN DISPUTA ** Dnsmasq versi\u00f3n 2.86 presenta un desbordamiento de buffer en la regi\u00f3n heap de la memoria en la funci\u00f3n extract_name (llamado desde hash_questions y fuzz_util.c). NOTA: la posici\u00f3n del proveedor es que CVE-2021-45951 a CVE-2021-45957 \"no representan vulnerabilidades reales, seg\u00fan nuestro conocimiento\"\n" } ], "id": "CVE-2021-45953", "lastModified": "2024-04-11T01:13:28.543", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV2": [ { "acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "cvssData": { "accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL", "baseScore": 7.5, "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL", "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", "version": "2.0" }, "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "impactScore": 6.4, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false } ], "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] }, "published": "2022-01-01T00:15:08.593", "references": [ { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Exploit", "Issue Tracking", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=35858" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz-vulns/blob/main/vulns/dnsmasq/OSV-2021-929.yaml" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016162.html" }, { "source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": [ "Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory" ], "url": "https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q1/016164.html" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-787" } ], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary" } ] } } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.