cve-2022-1632
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-09-01 00:00
Modified
2024-08-03 00:10
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
An Improper Certificate Validation attack was found in Openshift. A re-encrypt Route with destinationCACertificate explicitly set to the default serviceCA skips internal Service TLS certificate validation. This flaw allows an attacker to exploit an invalid certificate, resulting in a loss of confidentiality.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
secalert@redhat.com | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181 | Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181 | Issue Tracking, Vendor Advisory |
{ "containers": { "adp": [ { "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:10:03.751Z", "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "shortName": "CVE" }, "references": [ { "tags": [ "x_transferred" ], "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181" } ], "title": "CVE Program Container" } ], "cna": { "affected": [ { "product": "Openshift", "vendor": "n/a", "versions": [ { "status": "affected", "version": "4.8.17" } ] } ], "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "An Improper Certificate Validation attack was found in Openshift. A re-encrypt Route with destinationCACertificate explicitly set to the default serviceCA skips internal Service TLS certificate validation. This flaw allows an attacker to exploit an invalid certificate, resulting in a loss of confidentiality." } ], "problemTypes": [ { "descriptions": [ { "cweId": "CWE-295", "description": "CWE-295", "lang": "en", "type": "CWE" } ] } ], "providerMetadata": { "dateUpdated": "2022-12-08T00:00:00", "orgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "shortName": "redhat" }, "references": [ { "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181" } ] } }, "cveMetadata": { "assignerOrgId": "53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749", "assignerShortName": "redhat", "cveId": "CVE-2022-1632", "datePublished": "2022-09-01T00:00:00", "dateReserved": "2022-05-09T00:00:00", "dateUpdated": "2024-08-03T00:10:03.751Z", "state": "PUBLISHED" }, "dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { "fkie_nvd": { "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"7B4BE2D6-43C3-4065-A213-5DB1325DC78F\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"932D137F-528B-4526-9A89-CD59FA1AB0FE\"}]}]}, {\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:34:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"A930E247-0B43-43CB-98FF-6CE7B8189835\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:35:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"80E516C0-98A4-4ADE-B69F-66A772E2BAAA\"}]}]}]", "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"An Improper Certificate Validation attack was found in Openshift. A re-encrypt Route with destinationCACertificate explicitly set to the default serviceCA skips internal Service TLS certificate validation. This flaw allows an attacker to exploit an invalid certificate, resulting in a loss of confidentiality.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Se ha encontrado un ataque de comprobaci\\u00f3n inapropiada de certificados en Openshift. Una ruta de re-encriptaci\\u00f3n con destinationCACertificate expl\\u00edcitamente establecido en el serviceCA por defecto omite la comprobaci\\u00f3n del certificado TLS del servicio interno. Este fallo permite a un atacante explotar un certificado no v\\u00e1lido, resultando en una p\\u00e9rdida de confidencialidad\"}]", "id": "CVE-2022-1632", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:41:08.257", "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 6.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}", "published": "2022-09-01T21:15:08.957", "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181\", \"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Issue Tracking\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}]", "sourceIdentifier": "secalert@redhat.com", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"secalert@redhat.com\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}]}]" }, "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-1632\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"published\":\"2022-09-01T21:15:08.957\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T06:41:08.257\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"An Improper Certificate Validation attack was found in Openshift. A re-encrypt Route with destinationCACertificate explicitly set to the default serviceCA skips internal Service TLS certificate validation. This flaw allows an attacker to exploit an invalid certificate, resulting in a loss of confidentiality.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Se ha encontrado un ataque de comprobaci\u00f3n inapropiada de certificados en Openshift. Una ruta de re-encriptaci\u00f3n con destinationCACertificate expl\u00edcitamente establecido en el serviceCA por defecto omite la comprobaci\u00f3n del certificado TLS del servicio interno. Este fallo permite a un atacante explotar un certificado no v\u00e1lido, resultando en una p\u00e9rdida de confidencialidad\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":6.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"7B4BE2D6-43C3-4065-A213-5DB1325DC78F\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:openshift_container_platform:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"932D137F-528B-4526-9A89-CD59FA1AB0FE\"}]}]},{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:34:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A930E247-0B43-43CB-98FF-6CE7B8189835\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:35:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"80E516C0-98A4-4ADE-B69F-66A772E2BAAA\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181\",\"source\":\"secalert@redhat.com\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081181\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Issue Tracking\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}" } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.