cve-2022-37022
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2022-08-31 07:00
Modified
2024-08-03 10:21
Severity ?
EPSS score ?
Summary
Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory |
Impacted products
Vendor | Product | Version | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Apache Software Foundation | Apache Geode |
Version: Apache Geode < |
{ containers: { adp: [ { providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2024-08-03T10:21:32.458Z", orgId: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", shortName: "CVE", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_refsource_MISC", "x_transferred", ], url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m", }, ], title: "CVE Program Container", }, ], cna: { affected: [ { platforms: [ "Java 11", ], product: "Apache Geode", vendor: "Apache Software Foundation", versions: [ { lessThanOrEqual: "1.12.2", status: "affected", version: "Apache Geode", versionType: "custom", }, ], }, ], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator.", }, ], metrics: [ { other: { content: { other: "high - possible RCE", }, type: "unknown", }, }, ], problemTypes: [ { descriptions: [ { cweId: "CWE-502", description: "CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data", lang: "en", type: "CWE", }, ], }, ], providerMetadata: { dateUpdated: "2022-08-31T07:00:15", orgId: "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09", shortName: "apache", }, references: [ { tags: [ "x_refsource_MISC", ], url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m", }, ], source: { defect: [ "GEODE-9064", ], discovery: "UNKNOWN", }, title: "Apache Geode deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11", workarounds: [ { lang: "en", value: "Disable affected services such as JMX over RMI unless they are required. JMX over RMI can be disabled by setting Geode property `jmx-manager` to false; this property defaults to false on Servers and true on Locators. ", }, ], x_generator: { engine: "Vulnogram 0.0.9", }, x_legacyV4Record: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "security@apache.org", ID: "CVE-2022-37022", STATE: "PUBLIC", TITLE: "Apache Geode deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "Apache Geode", version: { version_data: [ { platform: "Java 11", version_affected: "<=", version_name: "Apache Geode", version_value: "1.12.2", }, { platform: "Java 11", version_affected: "<=", version_name: "Apache Geode", version_value: "1.13.2 +1", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "Apache Software Foundation", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator.", }, ], }, generator: { engine: "Vulnogram 0.0.9", }, impact: [ { other: "high - possible RCE", }, ], problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "CWE-502 Deserialization of Untrusted Data", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m", refsource: "MISC", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m", }, ], }, source: { defect: [ "GEODE-9064", ], discovery: "UNKNOWN", }, work_around: [ { lang: "en", value: "Disable affected services such as JMX over RMI unless they are required. JMX over RMI can be disabled by setting Geode property `jmx-manager` to false; this property defaults to false on Servers and true on Locators. ", }, ], }, }, }, cveMetadata: { assignerOrgId: "f0158376-9dc2-43b6-827c-5f631a4d8d09", assignerShortName: "apache", cveId: "CVE-2022-37022", datePublished: "2022-08-31T07:00:15", dateReserved: "2022-07-29T00:00:00", dateUpdated: "2024-08-03T10:21:32.458Z", state: "PUBLISHED", }, dataType: "CVE_RECORD", dataVersion: "5.1", "vulnerability-lookup:meta": { fkie_nvd: { configurations: "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apache:geode:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"1.12.2\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"D4243EC0-031E-416C-9D3A-97BADF07A484\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:apache:geode:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"1.13.0\", \"versionEndIncluding\": \"1.13.2\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"F150FF4D-4442-4E08-9D00-2E24107A81FD\"}]}]}]", descriptions: "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Apache Geode versiones hasta 1.12.2 y 1.13.2, son vulnerables a un fallo de deserializaci\\u00f3n de datos no confiables cuando es usado JMX sobre RMI en Java versi\\u00f3n 11. Cualquier usuario que desee protegerse contra los ataques de deserializaci\\u00f3n que implican JMX o RMI debe actualizar a Apache Geode versi\\u00f3n 1.15. El uso de la versi\\u00f3n 1.15 en Java 11 proteger\\u00e1 autom\\u00e1ticamente a JMX sobre RMI contra los ataques de deserializaci\\u00f3n. Esto no deber\\u00eda tener ning\\u00fan impacto en el rendimiento ya que s\\u00f3lo afecta a JMX/RMI que Gfsh usa para comunicarse con el Administrador JMX que est\\u00e1 alojado en un Localizador\"}]", id: "CVE-2022-37022", lastModified: "2024-11-21T07:14:18.237", metrics: "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 8.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.8, \"impactScore\": 5.9}]}", published: "2022-08-31T07:15:07.363", references: "[{\"url\": \"https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m\", \"source\": \"security@apache.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Vendor Advisory\"]}]", sourceIdentifier: "security@apache.org", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: "[{\"source\": \"security@apache.org\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-502\"}]}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-502\"}]}]", }, nvd: "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-37022\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@apache.org\",\"published\":\"2022-08-31T07:15:07.363\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T07:14:18.237\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Apache Geode versiones hasta 1.12.2 y 1.13.2, son vulnerables a un fallo de deserialización de datos no confiables cuando es usado JMX sobre RMI en Java versión 11. Cualquier usuario que desee protegerse contra los ataques de deserialización que implican JMX o RMI debe actualizar a Apache Geode versión 1.15. El uso de la versión 1.15 en Java 11 protegerá automáticamente a JMX sobre RMI contra los ataques de deserialización. Esto no debería tener ningún impacto en el rendimiento ya que sólo afecta a JMX/RMI que Gfsh usa para comunicarse con el Administrador JMX que está alojado en un Localizador\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":8.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-502\"}]},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-502\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:geode:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"1.12.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"D4243EC0-031E-416C-9D3A-97BADF07A484\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:apache:geode:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"1.13.0\",\"versionEndIncluding\":\"1.13.2\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"F150FF4D-4442-4E08-9D00-2E24107A81FD\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m\",\"source\":\"security@apache.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}", }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.