fkie_cve-2022-37022
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2022-08-31 07:15
Modified
2024-11-21 07:14
Severity ?
Summary
Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator.
References
▼ | URL | Tags | |
---|---|---|---|
security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory |
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:apache:geode:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "D4243EC0-031E-416C-9D3A-97BADF07A484", versionEndIncluding: "1.12.2", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:apache:geode:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "F150FF4D-4442-4E08-9D00-2E24107A81FD", versionEndIncluding: "1.13.2", versionStartIncluding: "1.13.0", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "Apache Geode versions up to 1.12.2 and 1.13.2 are vulnerable to a deserialization of untrusted data flaw when using JMX over RMI on Java 11. Any user wishing to protect against deserialization attacks involving JMX or RMI should upgrade to Apache Geode 1.15. Use of 1.15 on Java 11 will automatically protect JMX over RMI against deserialization attacks. This should have no impact on performance since it only affects JMX/RMI which Gfsh uses to communicate with the JMX Manager which is hosted on a Locator.", }, { lang: "es", value: "Apache Geode versiones hasta 1.12.2 y 1.13.2, son vulnerables a un fallo de deserialización de datos no confiables cuando es usado JMX sobre RMI en Java versión 11. Cualquier usuario que desee protegerse contra los ataques de deserialización que implican JMX o RMI debe actualizar a Apache Geode versión 1.15. El uso de la versión 1.15 en Java 11 protegerá automáticamente a JMX sobre RMI contra los ataques de deserialización. Esto no debería tener ningún impacto en el rendimiento ya que sólo afecta a JMX/RMI que Gfsh usa para comunicarse con el Administrador JMX que está alojado en un Localizador", }, ], id: "CVE-2022-37022", lastModified: "2024-11-21T07:14:18.237", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 8.8, baseSeverity: "HIGH", confidentialityImpact: "HIGH", integrityImpact: "HIGH", privilegesRequired: "LOW", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 2.8, impactScore: 5.9, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }, published: "2022-08-31T07:15:07.363", references: [ { source: "security@apache.org", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/kr1y4l9752g1ww1shnmh8dbfjq785k4m", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "security@apache.org", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-502", }, ], source: "security@apache.org", type: "Secondary", }, { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-502", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.