CVE-2022-4203 (GCVE-0-2022-4203)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-02-24 14:53 – Updated: 2025-11-04 19:14
VLAI?
Summary
A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. The read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to a denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext) although we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory contents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.
Severity ?
No CVSS data available.
CWE
  • read buffer overrun
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
OpenSSL OpenSSL Affected: 3.0.0 , < 3.0.8 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Corey Bonnell from Digicert Viktor Dukhovni
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T19:14:06.670Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
            "tags": [
              "vendor-advisory",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt"
          },
          {
            "name": "3.0.8 git commit",
            "tags": [
              "patch",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc"
          },
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0003"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 4.9,
              "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2022-4203",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-03-06T15:57:14.416833Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-125",
                "description": "CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-03-20T20:45:49.225Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "product": "OpenSSL",
          "vendor": "OpenSSL",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "3.0.8",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "3.0.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Corey Bonnell from Digicert"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "remediation developer",
          "user": "00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000",
          "value": "Viktor Dukhovni"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2023-02-07T00:00:00.000Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,\u003cbr\u003especifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs\u003cbr\u003eafter certificate chain signature verification and requires either a\u003cbr\u003eCA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to\u003cbr\u003econtinue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path\u003cbr\u003eto a trusted issuer.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to\u003cbr\u003ea denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure\u003cbr\u003eof private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext)\u003cbr\u003ealthough we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory\u003cbr\u003econtents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious\u003cbr\u003eserver. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests\u003cbr\u003eclient authentication and a malicious client connects.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,\nspecifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs\nafter certificate chain signature verification and requires either a\nCA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to\ncontinue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path\nto a trusted issuer.\n\nThe read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to\na denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure\nof private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext)\nalthough we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory\ncontents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory.\n\nIn a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious\nserver. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests\nclient authentication and a malicious client connects."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "format": "other",
          "other": {
            "content": {
              "text": "Moderate"
            },
            "type": "https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "read buffer overrun",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-02-04T09:06:39.738Z",
        "orgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
        "shortName": "openssl"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "OpenSSL Advisory",
          "tags": [
            "vendor-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt"
        },
        {
          "name": "3.0.8 git commit",
          "tags": [
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "X.509 Name Constraints Read Buffer Overflow",
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5",
    "assignerShortName": "openssl",
    "cveId": "CVE-2022-4203",
    "datePublished": "2023-02-24T14:53:08.485Z",
    "dateReserved": "2022-11-29T10:00:42.027Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-11-04T19:14:06.670Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"3.0.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"3.0.8\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"A6DC5D88-4E99-48F2-8892-610ACA9B5B86\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,\\nspecifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs\\nafter certificate chain signature verification and requires either a\\nCA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to\\ncontinue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path\\nto a trusted issuer.\\n\\nThe read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to\\na denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure\\nof private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext)\\nalthough we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory\\ncontents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory.\\n\\nIn a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious\\nserver. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests\\nclient authentication and a malicious client connects.\\n\\n\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Un desbordamiento del b\\u00fafer de lectura puede activarse en la verificaci\\u00f3n de certificados X.509, espec\\u00edficamente en la verificaci\\u00f3n de restricciones de nombre. Tenga en cuenta que esto ocurre despu\\u00e9s de la verificaci\\u00f3n de la firma de la cadena de certificados y requiere que una CA haya firmado el certificado malicioso o que la aplicaci\\u00f3n contin\\u00fae con la verificaci\\u00f3n del certificado a pesar de no poder construir una ruta a un emisor de confianza. El desbordamiento del b\\u00fafer de lectura puede provocar un bloqueo que podr\\u00eda conducir a un ataque de denegaci\\u00f3n de servicio. En teor\\u00eda, tambi\\u00e9n podr\\u00eda provocar la divulgaci\\u00f3n de contenidos de memoria privada (como claves privadas o texto plano confidencial), aunque no conocemos ning\\u00fan exploit en funcionamiento que conduzca a la divulgaci\\u00f3n de contenidos de memoria al momento de la publicaci\\u00f3n de este aviso. En un cliente TLS, esto puede activarse al conectarse a un servidor malicioso. En un servidor TLS, esto puede activarse si el servidor solicita la autenticaci\\u00f3n del cliente y un cliente malicioso se conecta.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2022-4203",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T07:34:46.480",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 4.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 1.2, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}",
      "published": "2023-02-24T15:15:11.980",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc\", \"source\": \"openssl-security@openssl.org\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08\", \"source\": \"openssl-security@openssl.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt\", \"source\": \"openssl-security@openssl.org\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Mailing List\", \"Patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"}, {\"url\": \"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "openssl-security@openssl.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-125\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2022-4203\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"published\":\"2023-02-24T15:15:11.980\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-11-04T20:16:14.693\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,\\nspecifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs\\nafter certificate chain signature verification and requires either a\\nCA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to\\ncontinue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path\\nto a trusted issuer.\\n\\nThe read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to\\na denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure\\nof private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext)\\nalthough we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory\\ncontents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory.\\n\\nIn a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious\\nserver. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests\\nclient authentication and a malicious client connects.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Un desbordamiento del b\u00fafer de lectura puede activarse en la verificaci\u00f3n de certificados X.509, espec\u00edficamente en la verificaci\u00f3n de restricciones de nombre. Tenga en cuenta que esto ocurre despu\u00e9s de la verificaci\u00f3n de la firma de la cadena de certificados y requiere que una CA haya firmado el certificado malicioso o que la aplicaci\u00f3n contin\u00fae con la verificaci\u00f3n del certificado a pesar de no poder construir una ruta a un emisor de confianza. El desbordamiento del b\u00fafer de lectura puede provocar un bloqueo que podr\u00eda conducir a un ataque de denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. En teor\u00eda, tambi\u00e9n podr\u00eda provocar la divulgaci\u00f3n de contenidos de memoria privada (como claves privadas o texto plano confidencial), aunque no conocemos ning\u00fan exploit en funcionamiento que conduzca a la divulgaci\u00f3n de contenidos de memoria al momento de la publicaci\u00f3n de este aviso. En un cliente TLS, esto puede activarse al conectarse a un servidor malicioso. En un servidor TLS, esto puede activarse si el servidor solicita la autenticaci\u00f3n del cliente y un cliente malicioso se conecta.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":4.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.2,\"impactScore\":3.6},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":4.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-125\"}]},{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-125\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"3.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"3.0.8\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"A6DC5D88-4E99-48F2-8892-610ACA9B5B86\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt\",\"source\":\"openssl-security@openssl.org\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Mailing List\",\"Patch\"]},{\"url\":\"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0003\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt\", \"name\": \"OpenSSL Advisory\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc\", \"name\": \"3.0.8 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\", \"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08\", \"tags\": [\"x_transferred\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2023-0003\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-04T19:14:06.670Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.9, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"HIGH\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2022-4203\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-03-06T15:57:14.416833Z\"}}}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-125\", \"description\": \"CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-03-06T15:57:15.682Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"X.509 Name Constraints Read Buffer Overflow\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"user\": \"00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000\", \"value\": \"Corey Bonnell from Digicert\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"user\": \"00000000-0000-4000-9000-000000000000\", \"value\": \"Viktor Dukhovni\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"https://www.openssl.org/policies/secpolicy.html\", \"content\": {\"text\": \"Moderate\"}}, \"format\": \"other\"}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"OpenSSL\", \"product\": \"OpenSSL\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"3.0.0\", \"lessThan\": \"3.0.8\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\"}], \"datePublic\": \"2023-02-07T00:00:00.000Z\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt\", \"name\": \"OpenSSL Advisory\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc\", \"name\": \"3.0.8 git commit\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08\"}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,\\nspecifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs\\nafter certificate chain signature verification and requires either a\\nCA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to\\ncontinue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path\\nto a trusted issuer.\\n\\nThe read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to\\na denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure\\nof private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext)\\nalthough we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory\\ncontents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory.\\n\\nIn a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious\\nserver. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests\\nclient authentication and a malicious client connects.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,\u003cbr\u003especifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs\u003cbr\u003eafter certificate chain signature verification and requires either a\u003cbr\u003eCA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to\u003cbr\u003econtinue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path\u003cbr\u003eto a trusted issuer.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to\u003cbr\u003ea denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure\u003cbr\u003eof private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext)\u003cbr\u003ealthough we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory\u003cbr\u003econtents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious\u003cbr\u003eserver. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests\u003cbr\u003eclient authentication and a malicious client connects.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"description\": \"read buffer overrun\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"shortName\": \"openssl\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-02-04T09:06:39.738Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2022-4203\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-11-04T19:14:06.670Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2022-11-29T10:00:42.027Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"3a12439a-ef3a-4c79-92e6-6081a721f1e5\", \"datePublished\": \"2023-02-24T14:53:08.485Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"openssl\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.