fkie_cve-2022-4203
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2023-02-24 15:15
Modified
2025-03-20 21:15
Severity ?
4.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,
specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs
after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a
CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to
continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path
to a trusted issuer.
The read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to
a denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure
of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext)
although we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory
contents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory.
In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious
server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests
client authentication and a malicious client connects.
References
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "A6DC5D88-4E99-48F2-8892-610ACA9B5B86", versionEndExcluding: "3.0.8", versionStartIncluding: "3.0.0", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,\nspecifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs\nafter certificate chain signature verification and requires either a\nCA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to\ncontinue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path\nto a trusted issuer.\n\nThe read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead to\na denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the disclosure\nof private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive plaintext)\nalthough we are not aware of any working exploit leading to memory\ncontents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory.\n\nIn a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious\nserver. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests\nclient authentication and a malicious client connects.", }, { lang: "es", value: "Un desbordamiento del búfer de lectura puede activarse en la verificación de certificados X.509, específicamente en la verificación de restricciones de nombre. Tenga en cuenta que esto ocurre después de la verificación de la firma de la cadena de certificados y requiere que una CA haya firmado el certificado malicioso o que la aplicación continúe con la verificación del certificado a pesar de no poder construir una ruta a un emisor de confianza. El desbordamiento del búfer de lectura puede provocar un bloqueo que podría conducir a un ataque de denegación de servicio. En teoría, también podría provocar la divulgación de contenidos de memoria privada (como claves privadas o texto plano confidencial), aunque no conocemos ningún exploit en funcionamiento que conduzca a la divulgación de contenidos de memoria al momento de la publicación de este aviso. En un cliente TLS, esto puede activarse al conectarse a un servidor malicioso. En un servidor TLS, esto puede activarse si el servidor solicita la autenticación del cliente y un cliente malicioso se conecta.", }, ], id: "CVE-2022-4203", lastModified: "2025-03-20T21:15:14.713", metrics: { cvssMetricV31: [ { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 4.9, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "HIGH", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.2, impactScore: 3.6, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, { cvssData: { attackComplexity: "LOW", attackVector: "NETWORK", availabilityImpact: "HIGH", baseScore: 4.9, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", confidentialityImpact: "NONE", integrityImpact: "NONE", privilegesRequired: "HIGH", scope: "UNCHANGED", userInteraction: "NONE", vectorString: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", version: "3.1", }, exploitabilityScore: 1.2, impactScore: 3.6, source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }, published: "2023-02-24T15:15:11.980", references: [ { source: "openssl-security@openssl.org", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Patch", ], url: "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc", }, { source: "openssl-security@openssl.org", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08", }, { source: "openssl-security@openssl.org", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Mailing List", "Patch", ], url: "https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=c927a3492698c254637da836762f9b1f86cffabc", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "openssl-security@openssl.org", vulnStatus: "Modified", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-125", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-125", }, ], source: "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", type: "Secondary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.