CVE-2023-31141 (GCVE-0-2023-31141)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2023-05-08 20:33 – Updated: 2025-01-29 14:54
VLAI?
Summary
OpenSearch is open-source software suite for search, analytics, and observability applications. Prior to versions 1.3.10 and 2.7.0, there is an issue with the implementation of fine-grained access control rules (document-level security, field-level security and field masking) where they are not correctly applied to the queries during extremely rare race conditions potentially leading to incorrect access authorization. For this issue to be triggered, two concurrent requests need to land on the same instance exactly when query cache eviction happens, once every four hours. OpenSearch 1.3.10 and 2.7.0 contain a fix for this issue.
Severity ?
4.8 (Medium)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CWE
  • CWE-863 - Incorrect Authorization
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
opensearch-project security Affected: >= 1.0.0, < 1.3.10
Affected: >= 2.0.0, < 2.7.0
Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T14:45:25.774Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h",
            "tags": [
              "x_refsource_CONFIRM",
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      },
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2023-31141",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-01-29T14:54:15.080834Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-01-29T14:54:25.850Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "security",
          "vendor": "opensearch-project",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.3.10"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.7.0"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "OpenSearch is open-source software suite for search, analytics, and observability applications. Prior to versions 1.3.10 and 2.7.0, there is an issue with the implementation of fine-grained access control rules (document-level security, field-level security and field masking) where they are not correctly applied to the queries during extremely rare race conditions potentially leading to incorrect access authorization. For this issue to be triggered, two concurrent requests need to land on the same instance exactly when query cache eviction happens, once every four hours. OpenSearch 1.3.10 and 2.7.0 contain a fix for this issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.8,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-863",
              "description": "CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2023-05-08T20:33:58.601Z",
        "orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
        "shortName": "GitHub_M"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h",
          "tags": [
            "x_refsource_CONFIRM"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      },
      "title": "OpenSearch issue with fine-grained access control during extremely rare race conditions"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa",
    "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-31141",
    "datePublished": "2023-05-08T20:33:58.601Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-04-24T21:44:10.417Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-01-29T14:54:25.850Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "configurations": "[{\"nodes\": [{\"operator\": \"OR\", \"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:amazon:opensearch:*:*:*:*:*:docker:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"1.3.10\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"02F37153-8577-40FE-8306-998CFF26C3D0\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:amazon:opensearch:*:*:*:*:*:docker:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"2.0.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"2.7.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"5A0107FD-9F14-47A5-8995-AF65862055E8\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:amazon:opensearch_security:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"1.3.10\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"4646FDBE-3F9C-48C3-9C17-E4DC273AD2DE\"}, {\"vulnerable\": true, \"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:amazon:opensearch_security:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"2.0.0\", \"versionEndExcluding\": \"2.7.0\", \"matchCriteriaId\": \"9DDB430A-3C8B-4E3C-968A-E4C1AC52A18E\"}]}]}]",
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"OpenSearch is open-source software suite for search, analytics, and observability applications. Prior to versions 1.3.10 and 2.7.0, there is an issue with the implementation of fine-grained access control rules (document-level security, field-level security and field masking) where they are not correctly applied to the queries during extremely rare race conditions potentially leading to incorrect access authorization. For this issue to be triggered, two concurrent requests need to land on the same instance exactly when query cache eviction happens, once every four hours. OpenSearch 1.3.10 and 2.7.0 contain a fix for this issue.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2023-31141",
      "lastModified": "2024-11-21T08:01:28.700",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 4.8, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 1.2, \"impactScore\": 3.6}, {\"source\": \"nvd@nist.gov\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"baseScore\": 5.9, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 2.2, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}",
      "published": "2023-05-08T21:15:11.783",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\", \"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\", \"source\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"tags\": [\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "vulnStatus": "Modified",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"security-advisories@github.com\", \"type\": \"Primary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-863\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-31141\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"published\":\"2023-05-08T21:15:11.783\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-11-21T08:01:28.700\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Modified\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"OpenSearch is open-source software suite for search, analytics, and observability applications. Prior to versions 1.3.10 and 2.7.0, there is an issue with the implementation of fine-grained access control rules (document-level security, field-level security and field masking) where they are not correctly applied to the queries during extremely rare race conditions potentially leading to incorrect access authorization. For this issue to be triggered, two concurrent requests need to land on the same instance exactly when query cache eviction happens, once every four hours. OpenSearch 1.3.10 and 2.7.0 contain a fix for this issue.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":4.8,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"REQUIRED\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.2,\"impactScore\":3.6},{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":5.9,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-863\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:amazon:opensearch:*:*:*:*:*:docker:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.3.10\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"02F37153-8577-40FE-8306-998CFF26C3D0\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:amazon:opensearch:*:*:*:*:*:docker:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"2.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.7.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"5A0107FD-9F14-47A5-8995-AF65862055E8\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:amazon:opensearch_security:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"1.3.10\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"4646FDBE-3F9C-48C3-9C17-E4DC273AD2DE\"},{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:a:amazon:opensearch_security:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionStartIncluding\":\"2.0.0\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"2.7.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"9DDB430A-3C8B-4E3C-968A-E4C1AC52A18E\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\",\"source\":\"security-advisories@github.com\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\",\"source\":\"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\",\"tags\":[\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CVE Program Container\", \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\", \"x_transferred\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108\", \"shortName\": \"CVE\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-02T14:45:25.774Z\"}}, {\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2023-31141\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-01-29T14:54:15.080834Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-29T14:54:22.164Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"OpenSearch issue with fine-grained access control during extremely rare race conditions\", \"source\": {\"advisory\": \"GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\", \"discovery\": \"UNKNOWN\"}, \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 4.8, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"REQUIRED\", \"attackComplexity\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"LOW\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"opensearch-project\", \"product\": \"security\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 1.0.0, \u003c 1.3.10\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"\u003e= 2.0.0, \u003c 2.7.0\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\", \"name\": \"https://github.com/opensearch-project/security/security/advisories/GHSA-g8xc-6mf7-h28h\", \"tags\": [\"x_refsource_CONFIRM\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"OpenSearch is open-source software suite for search, analytics, and observability applications. Prior to versions 1.3.10 and 2.7.0, there is an issue with the implementation of fine-grained access control rules (document-level security, field-level security and field masking) where they are not correctly applied to the queries during extremely rare race conditions potentially leading to incorrect access authorization. For this issue to be triggered, two concurrent requests need to land on the same instance exactly when query cache eviction happens, once every four hours. OpenSearch 1.3.10 and 2.7.0 contain a fix for this issue.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-863\", \"description\": \"CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"shortName\": \"GitHub_M\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2023-05-08T20:33:58.601Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2023-31141\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-01-29T14:54:25.850Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2023-04-24T21:44:10.417Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa\", \"datePublished\": \"2023-05-08T20:33:58.601Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"GitHub_M\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.