cve-2023-34323
Vulnerability from cvelistv5
Published
2024-01-05 16:30
Modified
2024-08-02 16:10
Severity ?
Summary
xenstored: A transaction conflict can crash C Xenstored
References
Impacted products
XenXen
Show details on NVD website


{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T16:10:06.813Z",
          "orgId": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
          "shortName": "CVE"
        },
        "references": [
          {
            "tags": [
              "x_transferred"
            ],
            "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-440.html"
          }
        ],
        "title": "CVE Program Container"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "Xen",
          "vendor": "Xen",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "unknown",
              "version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-440"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "configurations": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "All versions of Xen up to and including 4.17 are vulnerable if XSA-326\nwas ingested.\n\nAll Xen systems using C Xenstored are vulnerable.  C Xenstored built\nusing -DNDEBUG (can be specified via EXTRA_CFLAGS_XEN_TOOLS=-DNDEBUG)\nare not vulnerable.  Systems using the OCaml variant of Xenstored are\nnot vulnerable.\n"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "finder",
          "value": "This issue was discovered by Stanislav Uschakow and Julien Grall, all\nfrom Amazon.\n"
        }
      ],
      "datePublic": "2023-10-10T11:26:00Z",
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "When a transaction is committed, C Xenstored will first check\nthe quota is correct before attempting to commit any nodes.  It would\nbe possible that accounting is temporarily negative if a node has\nbeen removed outside of the transaction.\n\nUnfortunately, some versions of C Xenstored are assuming that the\nquota cannot be negative and are using assert() to confirm it.  This\nwill lead to C Xenstored crash when tools are built without -DNDEBUG\n(this is the default).\n"
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "A malicious guest could craft a transaction that will hit the C\nXenstored bug and crash it.  This will result to the inability to\nperform any further domain administration like starting new guests,\nor adding/removing resources to or from any existing guest.\n"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-01-05T16:30:32.305Z",
        "orgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
        "shortName": "XEN"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-440.html"
        }
      ],
      "title": "xenstored: A transaction conflict can crash C Xenstored",
      "workarounds": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The problem can be avoided by using OCaml Xenstored variant.\n"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "23aa2041-22e1-471f-9209-9b7396fa234f",
    "assignerShortName": "XEN",
    "cveId": "CVE-2023-34323",
    "datePublished": "2024-01-05T16:30:32.305Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-06-01T10:44:17.065Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-02T16:10:06.813Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2023-34323\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"security@xen.org\",\"published\":\"2024-01-05T17:15:08.493\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-01-11T17:07:26.057\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Analyzed\",\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"When a transaction is committed, C Xenstored will first check\\nthe quota is correct before attempting to commit any nodes.  It would\\nbe possible that accounting is temporarily negative if a node has\\nbeen removed outside of the transaction.\\n\\nUnfortunately, some versions of C Xenstored are assuming that the\\nquota cannot be negative and are using assert() to confirm it.  This\\nwill lead to C Xenstored crash when tools are built without -DNDEBUG\\n(this is the default).\\n\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Cuando se confirma una transacci\u00f3n, C Xenstored primero verificar\u00e1 que la cuota sea correcta antes de intentar confirmar cualquier nodo. Ser\u00eda posible que la contabilidad fuera temporalmente negativa si se hubiera eliminado un nodo fuera de la transacci\u00f3n. Desafortunadamente, algunas versiones de C Xenstored asumen que la cuota no puede ser negativa y utilizan assert() para confirmarlo. Esto provocar\u00e1 un bloqueo de C Xenstored cuando las herramientas se creen sin -DNDEBUG (este es el valor predeterminado). \"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"LOW\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"baseScore\":5.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":1.8,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"nvd@nist.gov\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-476\"}]}],\"configurations\":[{\"nodes\":[{\"operator\":\"OR\",\"negate\":false,\"cpeMatch\":[{\"vulnerable\":true,\"criteria\":\"cpe:2.3:o:xen:xen:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\",\"versionEndExcluding\":\"4.17.0\",\"matchCriteriaId\":\"3B65D9EE-AB21-4DF4-A578-679B6357308F\"}]}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-440.html\",\"source\":\"security@xen.org\",\"tags\":[\"Patch\",\"Vendor Advisory\"]}]}}"
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.