gsd-2023-34323
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:20
Details
When a transaction is committed, C Xenstored will first check the quota is correct before attempting to commit any nodes. It would be possible that accounting is temporarily negative if a node has been removed outside of the transaction. Unfortunately, some versions of C Xenstored are assuming that the quota cannot be negative and are using assert() to confirm it. This will lead to C Xenstored crash when tools are built without -DNDEBUG (this is the default).
Aliases
Aliases



{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2023-34323",
    "id": "GSD-2023-34323"
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2023-34323"
      ],
      "details": "When a transaction is committed, C Xenstored will first check\nthe quota is correct before attempting to commit any nodes.  It would\nbe possible that accounting is temporarily negative if a node has\nbeen removed outside of the transaction.\n\nUnfortunately, some versions of C Xenstored are assuming that the\nquota cannot be negative and are using assert() to confirm it.  This\nwill lead to C Xenstored crash when tools are built without -DNDEBUG\n(this is the default).\n",
      "id": "GSD-2023-34323",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:20:31.106869Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security@xen.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2023-34323",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Xen",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "not down converted",
                          "x_cve_json_5_version_data": {
                            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
                            "versions": [
                              {
                                "status": "unknown",
                                "version": "consult Xen advisory XSA-440"
                              }
                            ]
                          }
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Xen"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "configuration": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "All versions of Xen up to and including 4.17 are vulnerable if XSA-326\nwas ingested.\n\nAll Xen systems using C Xenstored are vulnerable.  C Xenstored built\nusing -DNDEBUG (can be specified via EXTRA_CFLAGS_XEN_TOOLS=-DNDEBUG)\nare not vulnerable.  Systems using the OCaml variant of Xenstored are\nnot vulnerable.\n"
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This issue was discovered by Stanislav Uschakow and Julien Grall, all\nfrom Amazon.\n"
        }
      ],
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "When a transaction is committed, C Xenstored will first check\nthe quota is correct before attempting to commit any nodes.  It would\nbe possible that accounting is temporarily negative if a node has\nbeen removed outside of the transaction.\n\nUnfortunately, some versions of C Xenstored are assuming that the\nquota cannot be negative and are using assert() to confirm it.  This\nwill lead to C Xenstored crash when tools are built without -DNDEBUG\n(this is the default).\n"
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-440.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-440.html"
          }
        ]
      },
      "work_around": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The problem can be avoided by using OCaml Xenstored variant.\n"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "cve": {
        "configurations": [
          {
            "nodes": [
              {
                "cpeMatch": [
                  {
                    "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:xen:xen:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                    "matchCriteriaId": "3B65D9EE-AB21-4DF4-A578-679B6357308F",
                    "versionEndExcluding": "4.17.0",
                    "vulnerable": true
                  }
                ],
                "negate": false,
                "operator": "OR"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "When a transaction is committed, C Xenstored will first check\nthe quota is correct before attempting to commit any nodes.  It would\nbe possible that accounting is temporarily negative if a node has\nbeen removed outside of the transaction.\n\nUnfortunately, some versions of C Xenstored are assuming that the\nquota cannot be negative and are using assert() to confirm it.  This\nwill lead to C Xenstored crash when tools are built without -DNDEBUG\n(this is the default).\n"
          },
          {
            "lang": "es",
            "value": "Cuando se confirma una transacci\u00f3n, C Xenstored primero verificar\u00e1 que la cuota sea correcta antes de intentar confirmar cualquier nodo. Ser\u00eda posible que la contabilidad fuera temporalmente negativa si se hubiera eliminado un nodo fuera de la transacci\u00f3n. Desafortunadamente, algunas versiones de C Xenstored asumen que la cuota no puede ser negativa y utilizan assert() para confirmarlo. Esto provocar\u00e1 un bloqueo de C Xenstored cuando las herramientas se creen sin -DNDEBUG (este es el valor predeterminado). "
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2023-34323",
        "lastModified": "2024-01-11T17:07:26.057",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "LOCAL",
                "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
                "baseScore": 5.5,
                "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
                "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
                "scope": "UNCHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
              "impactScore": 3.6,
              "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
              "type": "Primary"
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2024-01-05T17:15:08.493",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security@xen.org",
            "tags": [
              "Patch",
              "Vendor Advisory"
            ],
            "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-440.html"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security@xen.org",
        "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-476"
              }
            ],
            "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
            "type": "Primary"
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.