CVE-2024-21574 (GCVE-0-2024-21574)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-12-12 08:15 – Updated: 2024-12-12 14:37
VLAI?
Summary
The issue stems from a missing validation of the pip field in a POST request sent to the /customnode/install endpoint used to install custom nodes which is added to the server by the extension. This allows an attacker to craft a request that triggers a pip install on a user controlled package or URL, resulting in remote code execution (RCE) on the server.
Severity ?
10 (Critical)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
ltdrdata ComfyUI-Manager Affected: 0 , < 2.51.1 (semver)
Create a notification for this product.
Credits
Raul Onitza-Klugman (Snyk Security Research)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-21574",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "total"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-12-12T14:35:52.666414Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-12-12T14:37:18.494Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "ComfyUI-Manager",
          "vendor": "ltdrdata",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "2.51.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Raul Onitza-Klugman (Snyk Security Research)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "The issue stems from a missing validation of the pip field in a POST request sent to the /customnode/install endpoint used to install custom nodes which is added to the server by the extension. This allows an attacker to craft a request that triggers a pip install on a user controlled package or URL, resulting in remote code execution (RCE) on the server."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 10,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "CHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackRequirements": "NONE",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "baseScore": 10,
            "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
            "version": "4.0",
            "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-94",
              "description": "Code Injection",
              "lang": "en"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-12-12T08:15:11.464Z",
        "orgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
        "shortName": "snyk"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager/commit/ffc095a3e5acc1c404773a0510e6d055a6a72b0e"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager/blob/ffc095a3e5acc1c404773a0510e6d055a6a72b0e/glob/manager_server.py#L798"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730",
    "assignerShortName": "snyk",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-21574",
    "datePublished": "2024-12-12T08:15:11.464Z",
    "dateReserved": "2023-12-22T12:33:20.131Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-12-12T14:37:18.494Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The issue stems from a missing validation of the pip field in a POST request sent to the /customnode/install endpoint used to install custom nodes which is added to the server by the extension. This allows an attacker to craft a request that triggers a pip install on a user controlled package or URL, resulting in remote code execution (RCE) on the server.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \" El problema surge de una falta de validaci\\u00f3n del campo pip en una solicitud POST enviada al endpoint /customnode/install que se utiliza para instalar nodos personalizados y que la extensi\\u00f3n agrega al servidor. Esto permite que un atacante cree una solicitud que active una instalaci\\u00f3n de pip en un paquete o URL controlados por el usuario, lo que da como resultado una ejecuci\\u00f3n de c\\u00f3digo remoto (RCE) en el servidor.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2024-21574",
      "lastModified": "2024-12-12T09:15:06.037",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV40\": [{\"source\": \"report@snyk.io\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\", \"baseScore\": 10.0, \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"vulnerableSystemConfidentiality\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerableSystemIntegrity\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnerableSystemAvailability\": \"HIGH\", \"subsequentSystemConfidentiality\": \"HIGH\", \"subsequentSystemIntegrity\": \"HIGH\", \"subsequentSystemAvailability\": \"HIGH\", \"exploitMaturity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"confidentialityRequirements\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"integrityRequirements\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"availabilityRequirements\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedAttackVector\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedAttackComplexity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedAttackRequirements\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedUserInteraction\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedVulnerableSystemConfidentiality\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedVulnerableSystemIntegrity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedVulnerableSystemAvailability\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedSubsequentSystemConfidentiality\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedSubsequentSystemIntegrity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"modifiedSubsequentSystemAvailability\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"safety\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"automatable\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"recovery\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"valueDensity\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\": \"NOT_DEFINED\", \"providerUrgency\": \"NOT_DEFINED\"}}], \"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"report@snyk.io\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 10.0, \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 6.0}]}",
      "published": "2024-12-12T09:15:06.037",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager/blob/ffc095a3e5acc1c404773a0510e6d055a6a72b0e/glob/manager_server.py#L798\", \"source\": \"report@snyk.io\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager/commit/ffc095a3e5acc1c404773a0510e6d055a6a72b0e\", \"source\": \"report@snyk.io\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "report@snyk.io",
      "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"report@snyk.io\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-94\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-21574\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"published\":\"2024-12-12T09:15:06.037\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-12-12T09:15:06.037\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The issue stems from a missing validation of the pip field in a POST request sent to the /customnode/install endpoint used to install custom nodes which is added to the server by the extension. This allows an attacker to craft a request that triggers a pip install on a user controlled package or URL, resulting in remote code execution (RCE) on the server.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\" El problema surge de una falta de validaci\u00f3n del campo pip en una solicitud POST enviada al endpoint /customnode/install que se utiliza para instalar nodos personalizados y que la extensi\u00f3n agrega al servidor. Esto permite que un atacante cree una solicitud que active una instalaci\u00f3n de pip en un paquete o URL controlados por el usuario, lo que da como resultado una ejecuci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo remoto (RCE) en el servidor.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":10.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":10.0,\"baseSeverity\":\"CRITICAL\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"CHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":6.0}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-94\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager/blob/ffc095a3e5acc1c404773a0510e6d055a6a72b0e/glob/manager_server.py#L798\",\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager/commit/ffc095a3e5acc1c404773a0510e6d055a6a72b0e\",\"source\":\"report@snyk.io\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-21574\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"total\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-12-12T14:35:52.666414Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-12-12T14:36:43.791Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Raul Onitza-Klugman (Snyk Security Research)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"CHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 10, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 10, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"CRITICAL\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"NONE\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"ltdrdata\", \"product\": \"ComfyUI-Manager\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"lessThan\": \"2.51.1\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager/commit/ffc095a3e5acc1c404773a0510e6d055a6a72b0e\"}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/ltdrdata/ComfyUI-Manager/blob/ffc095a3e5acc1c404773a0510e6d055a6a72b0e/glob/manager_server.py#L798\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"The issue stems from a missing validation of the pip field in a POST request sent to the /customnode/install endpoint used to install custom nodes which is added to the server by the extension. This allows an attacker to craft a request that triggers a pip install on a user controlled package or URL, resulting in remote code execution (RCE) on the server.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-94\", \"description\": \"Code Injection\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730\", \"shortName\": \"snyk\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-12-12T08:15:11.464Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-21574\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-12-12T14:37:18.494Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2023-12-22T12:33:20.131Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"bae035ff-b466-4ff4-94d0-fc9efd9e1730\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-12-12T08:15:11.464Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"snyk\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.