CVE-2024-41996 (GCVE-0-2024-41996)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2024-08-26 00:00 – Updated: 2024-08-26 15:17
VLAI?
Summary
Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the client side) to trigger unnecessarily expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. The client may cause asymmetric resource consumption. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE and validate the order of the public key.
CWE
  • n/a
Assigner
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "affected": [
          {
            "cpes": [
              "cpe:2.3:a:diffie-hellman_key_exchange_project:diffie-hellman_key_exchange:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
            ],
            "defaultStatus": "unknown",
            "product": "diffie-hellman_key_exchange",
            "vendor": "diffie-hellman_key_exchange_project",
            "versions": [
              {
                "lessThanOrEqual": "*",
                "status": "affected",
                "version": "0",
                "versionType": "custom"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "metrics": [
          {
            "cvssV3_1": {
              "attackComplexity": "LOW",
              "attackVector": "NETWORK",
              "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
              "baseScore": 7.5,
              "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
              "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
              "integrityImpact": "NONE",
              "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
              "scope": "UNCHANGED",
              "userInteraction": "NONE",
              "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
              "version": "3.1"
            }
          },
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2024-41996",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2024-08-26T15:15:18.339789Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "problemTypes": [
          {
            "descriptions": [
              {
                "cweId": "CWE-295",
                "description": "CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation",
                "lang": "en",
                "type": "CWE"
              }
            ]
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2024-08-26T15:17:29.404Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "n/a",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the client side) to trigger unnecessarily expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. The client may cause asymmetric resource consumption. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE and validate the order of the public key."
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "description": "n/a",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "text"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2024-08-26T05:59:37.163238",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://gist.github.com/c0r0n3r/abccc14d4d96c0442f3a77fa5ca255d1"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/details/"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/faq/"
        }
      ]
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2024-41996",
    "datePublished": "2024-08-26T00:00:00",
    "dateReserved": "2024-07-26T00:00:00",
    "dateUpdated": "2024-08-26T15:17:29.404Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "fkie_nvd": {
      "descriptions": "[{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the client side) to trigger unnecessarily expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. The client may cause asymmetric resource consumption. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE and validate the order of the public key.\"}, {\"lang\": \"es\", \"value\": \"Validar el orden de las claves p\\u00fablicas en el Protocolo de acuerdo de claves Diffie-Hellman, cuando se utiliza un valor primario seguro aprobado, permite a atacantes remotos (desde el lado del cliente) activar c\\u00e1lculos de exponenciaci\\u00f3n modular DHE del lado del servidor innecesariamente costosos. El cliente puede provocar un consumo asim\\u00e9trico de recursos. El escenario de ataque b\\u00e1sico es que el cliente debe afirmar que solo puede comunicarse con DHE y el servidor debe configurarse para permitir DHE y validar el orden de la clave p\\u00fablica.\"}]",
      "id": "CVE-2024-41996",
      "lastModified": "2024-08-26T16:35:11.247",
      "metrics": "{\"cvssMetricV31\": [{\"source\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"cvssData\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\"}, \"exploitabilityScore\": 3.9, \"impactScore\": 3.6}]}",
      "published": "2024-08-26T06:15:04.603",
      "references": "[{\"url\": \"https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/details/\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/faq/\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}, {\"url\": \"https://gist.github.com/c0r0n3r/abccc14d4d96c0442f3a77fa5ca255d1\", \"source\": \"cve@mitre.org\"}]",
      "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
      "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
      "weaknesses": "[{\"source\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"type\": \"Secondary\", \"description\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CWE-295\"}]}]"
    },
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2024-41996\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@mitre.org\",\"published\":\"2024-08-26T06:15:04.603\",\"lastModified\":\"2024-08-26T16:35:11.247\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the client side) to trigger unnecessarily expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. The client may cause asymmetric resource consumption. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE and validate the order of the public key.\"},{\"lang\":\"es\",\"value\":\"Validar el orden de las claves p\u00fablicas en el Protocolo de acuerdo de claves Diffie-Hellman, cuando se utiliza un valor primario seguro aprobado, permite a atacantes remotos (desde el lado del cliente) activar c\u00e1lculos de exponenciaci\u00f3n modular DHE del lado del servidor innecesariamente costosos. El cliente puede provocar un consumo asim\u00e9trico de recursos. El escenario de ataque b\u00e1sico es que el cliente debe afirmar que solo puede comunicarse con DHE y el servidor debe configurarse para permitir DHE y validar el orden de la clave p\u00fablica.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\",\"baseScore\":7.5,\"baseSeverity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":3.9,\"impactScore\":3.6}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-295\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/details/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/faq/\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"},{\"url\":\"https://gist.github.com/c0r0n3r/abccc14d4d96c0442f3a77fa5ca255d1\",\"source\":\"cve@mitre.org\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV3_1\": {\"scope\": \"UNCHANGED\", \"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 7.5, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"HIGH\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H\", \"integrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"availabilityImpact\": \"HIGH\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"confidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\"}}, {\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2024-41996\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"yes\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2024-08-26T15:15:18.339789Z\"}}}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:diffie-hellman_key_exchange_project:diffie-hellman_key_exchange:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"vendor\": \"diffie-hellman_key_exchange_project\", \"product\": \"diffie-hellman_key_exchange\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0\", \"versionType\": \"custom\", \"lessThanOrEqual\": \"*\"}], \"defaultStatus\": \"unknown\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-295\", \"description\": \"CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-26T15:17:17.331Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"n/a\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://gist.github.com/c0r0n3r/abccc14d4d96c0442f3a77fa5ca255d1\"}, {\"url\": \"https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/details/\"}, {\"url\": \"https://dheatattack.gitlab.io/faq/\"}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the client side) to trigger unnecessarily expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. The client may cause asymmetric resource consumption. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE and validate the order of the public key.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"text\", \"description\": \"n/a\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"shortName\": \"mitre\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-26T05:59:37.163238\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2024-41996\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2024-08-26T15:17:29.404Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2024-07-26T00:00:00\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca\", \"datePublished\": \"2024-08-26T00:00:00\", \"assignerShortName\": \"mitre\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…