CVE-2025-32060 (GCVE-0-2025-32060)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-02-15 10:46 – Updated: 2026-02-15 10:46
VLAI?
Title
Absence of Kernel Module Signature Verification on Linux System of Infotainment ECU
Summary
The system suffers from the absence of a kernel module signature verification. If an attacker can execute commands on behalf of root user (due to additional vulnerabilities), then he/she is also able to load custom kernel modules to the kernel space and execute code in the kernel context. Such a flaw can lead to taking control over the entire system.
First identified on Nissan Leaf ZE1 manufactured in 2020.
Severity ?
6.7 (Medium)
CWE
- CWE-347 - Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature
Assigner
References
| URL | Tags | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bosch | Infotainment system ECU |
Affected:
283C30861E
|
Credits
Mikhail Evdokimov (PCA Cyber Security Assessment Team)
{
"containers": {
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"platforms": [
"Linux"
],
"product": "Infotainment system ECU",
"vendor": "Bosch",
"versions": [
{
"status": "affected",
"version": "283C30861E"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Mikhail Evdokimov (PCA Cyber Security Assessment Team)"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "The system suffers from the absence of a kernel module signature verification. If an attacker can execute commands on behalf of root user (due to additional vulnerabilities), then he/she is also able to load custom kernel modules to the kernel space and execute code in the kernel context. Such a flaw can lead to taking control over the entire system.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\n\nFirst identified on \u003cspan style=\"background-color: var(--wht);\"\u003eNissan Leaf ZE1 manufactured in 2020.\u003c/span\u003e\n\n\u003cbr\u003e"
}
],
"value": "The system suffers from the absence of a kernel module signature verification. If an attacker can execute commands on behalf of root user (due to additional vulnerabilities), then he/she is also able to load custom kernel modules to the kernel space and execute code in the kernel context. Such a flaw can lead to taking control over the entire system.\n\n\n\nFirst identified on Nissan Leaf ZE1 manufactured in 2020."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-115",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV3_1": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 6.7,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-347",
"description": "CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-15T10:46:23.570Z",
"orgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
"shortName": "ASRG"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"product"
],
"url": "https://www.nissan.co.uk/vehicles/new-vehicles/leaf.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"media-coverage"
],
"url": "http://i.blackhat.com/Asia-25/Asia-25-Evdokimov-Remote-Exploitation-of-Nissan-Leaf.pdf"
},
{
"tags": [
"third-party-advisory"
],
"url": "https://pcacybersecurity.com/resources/advisory/vulnerabilities-in-nissan-infotainment-manufactured-by-bosch"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "UNKNOWN"
},
"title": "Absence of Kernel Module Signature Verification on Linux System of Infotainment ECU",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "Vulnogram 0.2.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "c15abc07-96a9-4d11-a503-5d621bfe42ba",
"assignerShortName": "ASRG",
"cveId": "CVE-2025-32060",
"datePublished": "2026-02-15T10:46:23.570Z",
"dateReserved": "2025-04-03T15:32:43.282Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-02-15T10:46:23.570Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-32060\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cve@asrg.io\",\"published\":\"2026-02-15T11:15:54.023\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-02-15T11:15:54.023\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Received\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"The system suffers from the absence of a kernel module signature verification. If an attacker can execute commands on behalf of root user (due to additional vulnerabilities), then he/she is also able to load custom kernel modules to the kernel space and execute code in the kernel context. Such a flaw can lead to taking control over the entire system.\\n\\n\\n\\nFirst identified on Nissan Leaf ZE1 manufactured in 2020.\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\",\"baseScore\":6.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"LOCAL\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"HIGH\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"integrityImpact\":\"HIGH\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"HIGH\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":0.8,\"impactScore\":5.9}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-347\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"http://i.blackhat.com/Asia-25/Asia-25-Evdokimov-Remote-Exploitation-of-Nissan-Leaf.pdf\",\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\"},{\"url\":\"https://pcacybersecurity.com/resources/advisory/vulnerabilities-in-nissan-infotainment-manufactured-by-bosch\",\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\"},{\"url\":\"https://www.nissan.co.uk/vehicles/new-vehicles/leaf.html\",\"source\":\"cve@asrg.io\"}]}}"
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…