CVE-2025-9604 (GCVE-0-2025-9604)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2025-08-29 01:32 – Updated: 2025-08-29 13:36
VLAI?
Title
coze-studio aes.go hard-coded key
Summary
A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): "For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt."
Severity ?
6.3 (Medium)
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X
3.7 (Low)
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:X/RL:O/RC:C
3.7 (Low)
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:X/RL:O/RC:C
CWE
  • CWE-321 - Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key
  • CWE-320 - Key Management Error
Assigner
References
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
n/a coze-studio Affected: 0.2.0
Affected: 0.2.1
Affected: 0.2.2
Affected: 0.2.3
Affected: 0.2.4
Credits
kexinoh (VulDB User)
Show details on NVD website
To clipboard 

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-9604",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-08-29T13:36:08.725317Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-08-29T13:36:16.125Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "product": "coze-studio",
          "vendor": "n/a",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.2.0"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.2.1"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.2.2"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.2.3"
            },
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.2.4"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "type": "reporter",
          "value": "kexinoh (VulDB User)"
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\r . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\""
        },
        {
          "lang": "de",
          "value": "Eine Schwachstelle wurde in coze-studio bis 0.2.4 gefunden. Es geht dabei um eine nicht klar definierte Funktion der Datei backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. Durch Manipulation des Arguments AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey mit unbekannten Daten kann eine use of hard-coded cryptographic key\r -Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann \u00fcber das Netzwerk passieren. Das Durchf\u00fchren eines Angriffs ist mit einer relativ hohen Komplexit\u00e4t verbunden. Die Ausnutzung wird als schwierig beschrieben. Als bestm\u00f6gliche Massnahme wird Patching empfohlen."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV4_0": {
            "baseScore": 6.3,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X",
            "version": "4.0"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 3.7,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:X/RL:O/RC:C",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV3_0": {
            "baseScore": 3.7,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:X/RL:O/RC:C",
            "version": "3.0"
          }
        },
        {
          "cvssV2_0": {
            "baseScore": 2.6,
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N/E:ND/RL:OF/RC:C",
            "version": "2.0"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-321",
              "description": "Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-320",
              "description": "Key Management Error",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-08-29T01:32:09.045Z",
        "orgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
        "shortName": "VulDB"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "name": "VDB-321780 | coze-studio aes.go hard-coded key",
          "tags": [
            "vdb-entry",
            "technical-description"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuldb.com/?id.321780"
        },
        {
          "name": "VDB-321780 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)",
          "tags": [
            "signature",
            "permissions-required"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321780"
        },
        {
          "name": "Submit #636417 | coze-dev coze-studio \u003c0.2.4 Cryptographic Issues",
          "tags": [
            "third-party-advisory"
          ],
          "url": "https://vuldb.com/?submit.636417"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/505"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/505#issuecomment-3148568862"
        },
        {
          "tags": [
            "issue-tracking",
            "patch"
          ],
          "url": "https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/pull/533"
        }
      ],
      "timeline": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-08-28T00:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "Advisory disclosed"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-08-28T02:00:00.000Z",
          "value": "VulDB entry created"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "time": "2025-08-28T17:19:01.000Z",
          "value": "VulDB entry last update"
        }
      ],
      "title": "coze-studio aes.go hard-coded key"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5",
    "assignerShortName": "VulDB",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-9604",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-29T01:32:09.045Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-08-28T15:13:46.197Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-08-29T13:36:16.125Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2025-9604\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"published\":\"2025-08-29T02:15:32.730\",\"lastModified\":\"2025-08-29T16:24:29.730\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Awaiting Analysis\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\\r . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \\\"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\\\"\"}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"attackRequirements\":\"NONE\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"cvssMetricV31\":[{\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"3.1\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":3.7,\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"scope\":\"UNCHANGED\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"exploitabilityScore\":2.2,\"impactScore\":1.4}],\"cvssMetricV2\":[{\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"2.0\",\"vectorString\":\"AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N\",\"baseScore\":2.6,\"accessVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"accessComplexity\":\"HIGH\",\"authentication\":\"NONE\",\"confidentialityImpact\":\"PARTIAL\",\"integrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"availabilityImpact\":\"NONE\"},\"baseSeverity\":\"LOW\",\"exploitabilityScore\":4.9,\"impactScore\":2.9,\"acInsufInfo\":false,\"obtainAllPrivilege\":false,\"obtainUserPrivilege\":false,\"obtainOtherPrivilege\":false,\"userInteractionRequired\":false}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\",\"type\":\"Primary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-320\"},{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-321\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/505\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/505#issuecomment-3148568862\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/pull/533\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321780\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://vuldb.com/?id.321780\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"},{\"url\":\"https://vuldb.com/?submit.636417\",\"source\":\"cna@vuldb.com\"}]}}",
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2025-9604\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"none\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2025-08-29T13:36:08.725317Z\"}}}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-29T13:36:12.670Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"coze-studio aes.go hard-coded key\", \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"reporter\", \"value\": \"kexinoh (VulDB User)\"}], \"metrics\": [{\"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 6.3, \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X\"}}, {\"cvssV3_1\": {\"version\": \"3.1\", \"baseScore\": 3.7, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:X/RL:O/RC:C\"}}, {\"cvssV3_0\": {\"version\": \"3.0\", \"baseScore\": 3.7, \"baseSeverity\": \"LOW\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:X/RL:O/RC:C\"}}, {\"cvssV2_0\": {\"version\": \"2.0\", \"baseScore\": 2.6, \"vectorString\": \"AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N/E:ND/RL:OF/RC:C\"}}], \"affected\": [{\"vendor\": \"n/a\", \"product\": \"coze-studio\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.2.0\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.2.1\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.2.2\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.2.3\"}, {\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.2.4\"}]}], \"timeline\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-08-28T00:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"Advisory disclosed\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-08-28T02:00:00.000Z\", \"value\": \"VulDB entry created\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"time\": \"2025-08-28T17:19:01.000Z\", \"value\": \"VulDB entry last update\"}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://vuldb.com/?id.321780\", \"name\": \"VDB-321780 | coze-studio aes.go hard-coded key\", \"tags\": [\"vdb-entry\", \"technical-description\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321780\", \"name\": \"VDB-321780 | CTI Indicators (IOB, IOC, TTP, IOA)\", \"tags\": [\"signature\", \"permissions-required\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://vuldb.com/?submit.636417\", \"name\": \"Submit #636417 | coze-dev coze-studio \u003c0.2.4 Cryptographic Issues\", \"tags\": [\"third-party-advisory\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/505\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/505#issuecomment-3148568862\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/pull/533\", \"tags\": [\"issue-tracking\", \"patch\"]}], \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\\r . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \\\"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\\\"\"}, {\"lang\": \"de\", \"value\": \"Eine Schwachstelle wurde in coze-studio bis 0.2.4 gefunden. Es geht dabei um eine nicht klar definierte Funktion der Datei backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. Durch Manipulation des Arguments AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey mit unbekannten Daten kann eine use of hard-coded cryptographic key\\r -Schwachstelle ausgenutzt werden. Der Angriff kann \\u00fcber das Netzwerk passieren. Das Durchf\\u00fchren eines Angriffs ist mit einer relativ hohen Komplexit\\u00e4t verbunden. Die Ausnutzung wird als schwierig beschrieben. Als bestm\\u00f6gliche Massnahme wird Patching empfohlen.\"}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-321\", \"description\": \"Use of Hard-coded Cryptographic Key\"}]}, {\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-320\", \"description\": \"Key Management Error\"}]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"shortName\": \"VulDB\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-29T01:32:09.045Z\"}}}",
      "cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2025-9604\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2025-08-29T13:36:16.125Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2025-08-28T15:13:46.197Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"1af790b2-7ee1-4545-860a-a788eba489b5\", \"datePublished\": \"2025-08-29T01:32:09.045Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"VulDB\"}",
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.1"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.