GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

CVE-2026-16328 (GCVE-0-2026-16328)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-29 18:32 – Updated: 2026-07-29 19:11
VLAI
Title
consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure
Summary
In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server's configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server's Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.
SSVC
Exploitation: none Automatable: yes Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-07-29 19:10 UTC
CWE
  • CWE-918 - Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version CPE status
HashiCorp Tooling Affected: 0.1.0 , < 0.1.4 (semver)
guessed Create a notification for this product.
Show details on NVD website

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-16328",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "64 bit",
            "32 bit",
            "x86",
            "ARM",
            "MacOS",
            "Windows",
            "Linux"
          ],
          "product": "Tooling",
          "repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server",
          "vendor": "HashiCorp",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThan": "0.1.4",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0.1.0",
              "versionType": "semver"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "credits": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "This issue was identified by HE WEI (\u30ae\u30ab\u30af)."
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "supportingMedia": [
            {
              "base64": false,
              "type": "text/html",
              "value": "\u003cp\u003eIn consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr/\u003e"
            }
          ],
          "value": "In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
        }
      ],
      "impacts": [
        {
          "capecId": "CAPEC-664",
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 8.6,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "format": "CVSS",
          "scenarios": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "GENERAL"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-918",
              "description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
        "orgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
        "shortName": "HashiCorp"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612"
        }
      ],
      "source": {
        "advisory": "HCSEC-2026-24",
        "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
      },
      "title": "consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure"
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
    "assignerShortName": "HashiCorp",
    "cveId": "CVE-2026-16328",
    "datePublished": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
    "dateReserved": "2026-07-20T17:50:23.169Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.2",
  "vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
    "epss": {
      "cve": "CVE-2026-16328",
      "date": "2026-09-18",
      "epss": "0.00232",
      "percentile": "0.14412"
    },
    "nvd": {
      "cve": {
        "affected": [
          {
            "affectedData": [
              {
                "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                "platforms": [
                  "64 bit",
                  "32 bit",
                  "x86",
                  "ARM",
                  "MacOS",
                  "Windows",
                  "Linux"
                ],
                "product": "Tooling",
                "repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server",
                "vendor": "HashiCorp",
                "versions": [
                  {
                    "lessThan": "0.1.4",
                    "status": "affected",
                    "version": "0.1.0",
                    "versionType": "semver"
                  }
                ]
              }
            ],
            "source": "security@hashicorp.com"
          }
        ],
        "cveTags": [],
        "descriptions": [
          {
            "lang": "en",
            "value": "In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
          }
        ],
        "id": "CVE-2026-16328",
        "lastModified": "2026-07-30T14:08:23.057",
        "metrics": {
          "cvssMetricV31": [
            {
              "cvssData": {
                "attackComplexity": "LOW",
                "attackVector": "NETWORK",
                "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
                "baseScore": 8.6,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
                "integrityImpact": "NONE",
                "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
                "scope": "CHANGED",
                "userInteraction": "NONE",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
              "impactScore": 4.0,
              "source": "security@hashicorp.com",
              "type": "Secondary"
            }
          ],
          "ssvcV203": [
            {
              "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "ssvcData": {
                "id": "CVE-2026-16328",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "exploitation": "none"
                  },
                  {
                    "automatable": "yes"
                  },
                  {
                    "technicalImpact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              }
            }
          ]
        },
        "published": "2026-07-29T19:16:45.060",
        "references": [
          {
            "source": "security@hashicorp.com",
            "url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612"
          }
        ],
        "sourceIdentifier": "security@hashicorp.com",
        "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
        "weaknesses": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "en",
                "value": "CWE-918"
              }
            ],
            "source": "security@hashicorp.com",
            "type": "Secondary"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "vulnrichment": {
      "containers": {
        "adp": [
          {
            "metrics": [
              {
                "other": {
                  "content": {
                    "id": "CVE-2026-16328",
                    "options": [
                      {
                        "Exploitation": "none"
                      },
                      {
                        "Automatable": "yes"
                      },
                      {
                        "Technical Impact": "partial"
                      }
                    ],
                    "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                    "timestamp": "2026-07-29T19:10:50.793675Z",
                    "version": "2.0.3"
                  },
                  "type": "ssvc"
                }
              }
            ],
            "providerMetadata": {
              "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:00.399Z",
              "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
              "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
            },
            "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
          }
        ],
        "cna": {
          "affected": [
            {
              "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
              "platforms": [
                "64 bit",
                "32 bit",
                "x86",
                "ARM",
                "MacOS",
                "Windows",
                "Linux"
              ],
              "product": "Tooling",
              "repo": "https://github.com/hashicorp/consul-mcp-server",
              "vendor": "HashiCorp",
              "versions": [
                {
                  "lessThan": "0.1.4",
                  "status": "affected",
                  "version": "0.1.0",
                  "versionType": "semver"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "credits": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "This issue was identified by HE WEI (\u30ae\u30ab\u30af)."
            }
          ],
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "supportingMedia": [
                {
                  "base64": false,
                  "type": "text/html",
                  "value": "\u003cp\u003eIn consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cbr/\u003e"
                }
              ],
              "value": "In consul-mcp-server, versions 0.1.0 up to 0.1.3 did not restrict how the Consul backend address was supplied, allowing a connected client to override the server\u0027s configured Consul address via a request header. This may allow a malicious client to redirect the server\u0027s Consul API traffic to an attacker-controlled endpoint, potentially exfiltrating the Consul token configured on the server. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-16328, is fixed in consul-mcp-server 0.1.4."
            }
          ],
          "impacts": [
            {
              "capecId": "CAPEC-664",
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CAPEC-664: Server Side Request Forgery"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "metrics": [
            {
              "cvssV3_1": {
                "baseScore": 8.6,
                "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
                "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N",
                "version": "3.1"
              },
              "format": "CVSS",
              "scenarios": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "GENERAL"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "problemTypes": [
            {
              "descriptions": [
                {
                  "cweId": "CWE-918",
                  "description": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
                  "lang": "en",
                  "type": "CWE"
                }
              ]
            }
          ],
          "providerMetadata": {
            "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
            "orgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
            "shortName": "HashiCorp"
          },
          "references": [
            {
              "url": "https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2026-24-multiple-vulnerabilities-impacting-hashicorp-consul-mcp-server/77612"
            }
          ],
          "source": {
            "advisory": "HCSEC-2026-24",
            "discovery": "EXTERNAL"
          },
          "title": "consul-mcp-server vulnerable to server side request forgery leading to token exposure"
        }
      },
      "cveMetadata": {
        "assignerOrgId": "67fedba0-ff2e-4543-ba5b-aa93e87718cc",
        "assignerShortName": "HashiCorp",
        "cveId": "CVE-2026-16328",
        "datePublished": "2026-07-29T18:32:39.870Z",
        "dateReserved": "2026-07-20T17:50:23.169Z",
        "dateUpdated": "2026-07-29T19:11:05.959Z",
        "state": "PUBLISHED"
      },
      "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
      "dataVersion": "5.2"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…