CVE-2026-59249 (GCVE-0-2026-59249)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-07-16 11:39 – Updated: 2026-07-17 10:11
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
Sign-tolerant HTTP/1 chunk-size parser in Mint enables response smuggling against strict intermediaries on pooled connections
Summary
Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response smuggling) vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on the same pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.
The Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5 function in lib/mint/http1.ex parses the chunk-size line of a Transfer-Encoding: chunked response with Integer.parse(data, 16). RFC 7230 defines chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG and forbids any sign prefix, but Integer.parse/2 accepts an optional leading + or -. A chunk-size line of +5 is accepted as a five-byte chunk; lines of +0 and -0 are accepted as the terminating zero-length chunk and end the message body early.
An RFC-strict intermediary in the response path rejects these forms, so the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on where one response ends and the next begins. On a pooled keep-alive connection, an attacker-influenced origin can inject bytes that the client attributes to the next legitimate response on the same connection, poisoning the response queue and corrupting the responses returned to unrelated in-flight requests.
This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.3.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: partial
CISA Coordinator (v2.0.3)
CWE
- CWE-444 - Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advi… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59249.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59249 | related |
| https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/fc7d16… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | |
|---|---|---|---|
| elixir-mint | mint |
Affected:
0.1.0 , < 1.9.3
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
|
| elixir-mint | mint |
Affected:
60089586ec7adc9fddb09f69a2f5919ba9ac7f33 , < fc7d16538db7e40b56ed489f08683225cb0197fa
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
Credits
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-59249",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-07-16T12:37:52.637521Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-16T12:38:16.316Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advisories/GHSA-x3x7-96vm-6h2w"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027"
],
"packageName": "mint",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/mint",
"product": "mint",
"programFiles": [
"lib/mint/http1.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027:decode_body/5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint",
"vendor": "elixir-mint",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.9.3",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027"
],
"packageName": "elixir-mint/mint",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/elixir-mint/mint",
"product": "mint",
"programFiles": [
"lib/mint/http1.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027:decode_body/5"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint",
"vendor": "elixir-mint",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "fc7d16538db7e40b56ed489f08683225cb0197fa",
"status": "affected",
"version": "60089586ec7adc9fddb09f69a2f5919ba9ac7f33",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"configurations": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eExploitation requires a deployment topology in which an RFC-strict HTTP/1 intermediary (proxy, load balancer, or WAF) sits between the Mint client and the attacker-influenced origin, and HTTP/1 connections between the client and the intermediary are reused across requests (keep-alive with connection pooling). Mint clients that talk directly to an origin without an intermediary, or that do not reuse connections, are not exploitable for response-queue poisoning even if the vulnerable parsing behavior is present.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Exploitation requires a deployment topology in which an RFC-strict HTTP/1 intermediary (proxy, load balancer, or WAF) sits between the Mint client and the attacker-influenced origin, and HTTP/1 connections between the client and the intermediary are reused across requests (keep-alive with connection pooling). Mint clients that talk directly to an origin without an intermediary, or that do not reuse connections, are not exploitable for response-queue poisoning even if the vulnerable parsing behavior is present."
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.9.3",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Thepigtails"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Andrea Leopardi"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation reviewer",
"value": "Eric Meadows-J\u00f6nsson"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "analyst",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eInconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response smuggling) vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on the same pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe \u003ctt\u003eMint.HTTP1.decode_body/5\u003c/tt\u003e function in \u003ctt\u003elib/mint/http1.ex\u003c/tt\u003e parses the chunk-size line of a \u003ctt\u003eTransfer-Encoding: chunked\u003c/tt\u003e response with \u003ctt\u003eInteger.parse(data, 16)\u003c/tt\u003e. RFC 7230 defines \u003ctt\u003echunk-size = 1*HEXDIG\u003c/tt\u003e and forbids any sign prefix, but \u003ctt\u003eInteger.parse/2\u003c/tt\u003e accepts an optional leading \u003ctt\u003e+\u003c/tt\u003e or \u003ctt\u003e-\u003c/tt\u003e. A chunk-size line of \u003ctt\u003e+5\u003c/tt\u003e is accepted as a five-byte chunk; lines of \u003ctt\u003e+0\u003c/tt\u003e and \u003ctt\u003e-0\u003c/tt\u003e are accepted as the terminating zero-length chunk and end the message body early.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn RFC-strict intermediary in the response path rejects these forms, so the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on where one response ends and the next begins. On a pooled keep-alive connection, an attacker-influenced origin can inject bytes that the client attributes to the next legitimate response on the same connection, poisoning the response queue and corrupting the responses returned to unrelated in-flight requests.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.3.\u003c/p\u003e"
}
],
"value": "Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response smuggling) vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on the same pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.\n\nThe Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5 function in lib/mint/http1.ex parses the chunk-size line of a Transfer-Encoding: chunked response with Integer.parse(data, 16). RFC 7230 defines chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG and forbids any sign prefix, but Integer.parse/2 accepts an optional leading + or -. A chunk-size line of +5 is accepted as a five-byte chunk; lines of +0 and -0 are accepted as the terminating zero-length chunk and end the message body early.\n\nAn RFC-strict intermediary in the response path rejects these forms, so the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on where one response ends and the next begins. On a pooled keep-alive connection, an attacker-influenced origin can inject bytes that the client attributes to the next legitimate response on the same connection, poisoning the response queue and corrupting the responses returned to unrelated in-flight requests.\n\nThis issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.3."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-273",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-273 HTTP Response Smuggling"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-444",
"description": "CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (\u0027HTTP Request/Response Smuggling\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T10:11:36.783Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advisories/GHSA-x3x7-96vm-6h2w"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59249.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59249"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/fc7d16538db7e40b56ed489f08683225cb0197fa"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "Sign-tolerant HTTP/1 chunk-size parser in Mint enables response smuggling against strict intermediaries on pooled connections",
"x_generator": {
"engine": "cvelib 1.8.0"
}
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-59249",
"datePublished": "2026-07-16T11:39:29.939Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-07-04T04:24:03.652Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-07-17T10:11:36.783Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-59249",
"date": "2026-07-21",
"epss": "0.00301",
"percentile": "0.22182"
},
"nvd": "{\"cve\":{\"id\":\"CVE-2026-59249\",\"sourceIdentifier\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"published\":\"2026-07-16T12:18:07.170\",\"lastModified\":\"2026-07-16T13:49:40.270\",\"vulnStatus\":\"Deferred\",\"cveTags\":[],\"descriptions\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response smuggling) vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on the same pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.\\n\\nThe Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5 function in lib/mint/http1.ex parses the chunk-size line of a Transfer-Encoding: chunked response with Integer.parse(data, 16). RFC 7230 defines chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG and forbids any sign prefix, but Integer.parse/2 accepts an optional leading + or -. A chunk-size line of +5 is accepted as a five-byte chunk; lines of +0 and -0 are accepted as the terminating zero-length chunk and end the message body early.\\n\\nAn RFC-strict intermediary in the response path rejects these forms, so the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on where one response ends and the next begins. On a pooled keep-alive connection, an attacker-influenced origin can inject bytes that the client attributes to the next legitimate response on the same connection, poisoning the response queue and corrupting the responses returned to unrelated in-flight requests.\\n\\nThis issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.3.\"}],\"affected\":[{\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"affectedData\":[{\"vendor\":\"elixir-mint\",\"product\":\"mint\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://repo.hex.pm\",\"packageName\":\"mint\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"],\"modules\":[\"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027\"],\"programFiles\":[\"lib/mint/http1.ex\"],\"programRoutines\":[{\"name\":\"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027:decode_body/5\"}],\"repo\":\"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint\",\"packageURL\":\"pkg:hex/mint\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"0.1.0\",\"lessThan\":\"1.9.3\",\"versionType\":\"semver\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]},{\"vendor\":\"elixir-mint\",\"product\":\"mint\",\"defaultStatus\":\"unaffected\",\"collectionURL\":\"https://github.com\",\"packageName\":\"elixir-mint/mint\",\"cpes\":[\"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"],\"modules\":[\"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027\"],\"programFiles\":[\"lib/mint/http1.ex\"],\"programRoutines\":[{\"name\":\"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027:decode_body/5\"}],\"repo\":\"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint\",\"packageURL\":\"pkg:github/elixir-mint/mint\",\"versions\":[{\"version\":\"60089586ec7adc9fddb09f69a2f5919ba9ac7f33\",\"lessThan\":\"fc7d16538db7e40b56ed489f08683225cb0197fa\",\"versionType\":\"git\",\"status\":\"affected\"}]}]}],\"metrics\":{\"cvssMetricV40\":[{\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"cvssData\":{\"version\":\"4.0\",\"vectorString\":\"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X\",\"baseScore\":6.3,\"baseSeverity\":\"MEDIUM\",\"attackVector\":\"NETWORK\",\"attackComplexity\":\"LOW\",\"attackRequirements\":\"PRESENT\",\"privilegesRequired\":\"NONE\",\"userInteraction\":\"NONE\",\"vulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnIntegrityImpact\":\"LOW\",\"vulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subConfidentialityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subIntegrityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"subAvailabilityImpact\":\"NONE\",\"exploitMaturity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"confidentialityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"integrityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"availabilityRequirement\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackVector\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackComplexity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedAttackRequirements\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedPrivilegesRequired\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedUserInteraction\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Safety\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Automatable\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"Recovery\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"valueDensity\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"vulnerabilityResponseEffort\":\"NOT_DEFINED\",\"providerUrgency\":\"NOT_DEFINED\"}}],\"ssvcV203\":[{\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\",\"ssvcData\":{\"timestamp\":\"2026-07-16T12:37:52.637521Z\",\"id\":\"CVE-2026-59249\",\"options\":[{\"exploitation\":\"poc\"},{\"automatable\":\"no\"},{\"technicalImpact\":\"partial\"}],\"role\":\"CISA Coordinator\",\"version\":\"2.0.3\"}}]},\"weaknesses\":[{\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\",\"type\":\"Secondary\",\"description\":[{\"lang\":\"en\",\"value\":\"CWE-444\"}]}],\"references\":[{\"url\":\"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59249.html\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/fc7d16538db7e40b56ed489f08683225cb0197fa\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advisories/GHSA-x3x7-96vm-6h2w\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59249\",\"source\":\"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\"},{\"url\":\"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advisories/GHSA-x3x7-96vm-6h2w\",\"source\":\"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\"}]}}",
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": "{\"adp\": [{\"title\": \"CISA ADP Vulnrichment\", \"metrics\": [{\"other\": {\"type\": \"ssvc\", \"content\": {\"id\": \"CVE-2026-59249\", \"role\": \"CISA Coordinator\", \"options\": [{\"Exploitation\": \"poc\"}, {\"Automatable\": \"no\"}, {\"Technical Impact\": \"partial\"}], \"version\": \"2.0.3\", \"timestamp\": \"2026-07-16T12:37:52.637521Z\"}}}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advisories/GHSA-x3x7-96vm-6h2w\", \"tags\": [\"exploit\"]}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0\", \"shortName\": \"CISA-ADP\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-16T12:38:12.786Z\"}}], \"cna\": {\"title\": \"Sign-tolerant HTTP/1 chunk-size parser in Mint enables response smuggling against strict intermediaries on pooled connections\", \"source\": {\"discovery\": \"EXTERNAL\"}, \"credits\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"finder\", \"value\": \"Thepigtails\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation developer\", \"value\": \"Andrea Leopardi\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"remediation reviewer\", \"value\": \"Eric Meadows-J\\u00f6nsson\"}, {\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"analyst\", \"value\": \"Jonatan M\\u00e4nnchen / EEF\"}], \"impacts\": [{\"capecId\": \"CAPEC-273\", \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"CAPEC-273 HTTP Response Smuggling\"}]}], \"metrics\": [{\"format\": \"CVSS\", \"cvssV4_0\": {\"version\": \"4.0\", \"baseScore\": 6.3, \"attackVector\": \"NETWORK\", \"baseSeverity\": \"MEDIUM\", \"vectorString\": \"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N\", \"userInteraction\": \"NONE\", \"attackComplexity\": \"LOW\", \"attackRequirements\": \"PRESENT\", \"privilegesRequired\": \"NONE\", \"subIntegrityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnIntegrityImpact\": \"LOW\", \"subAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnAvailabilityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"subConfidentialityImpact\": \"NONE\", \"vulnConfidentialityImpact\": \"LOW\"}, \"scenarios\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"GENERAL\"}]}], \"affected\": [{\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"repo\": \"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint\", \"vendor\": \"elixir-mint\", \"modules\": [\"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027\"], \"product\": \"mint\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"0.1.0\", \"lessThan\": \"1.9.3\", \"versionType\": \"semver\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:hex/mint\", \"packageName\": \"mint\", \"programFiles\": [\"lib/mint/http1.ex\"], \"collectionURL\": \"https://repo.hex.pm\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"programRoutines\": [{\"name\": \"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027:decode_body/5\"}]}, {\"cpes\": [\"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\"], \"repo\": \"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint\", \"vendor\": \"elixir-mint\", \"modules\": [\"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027\"], \"product\": \"mint\", \"versions\": [{\"status\": \"affected\", \"version\": \"60089586ec7adc9fddb09f69a2f5919ba9ac7f33\", \"lessThan\": \"fc7d16538db7e40b56ed489f08683225cb0197fa\", \"versionType\": \"git\"}], \"packageURL\": \"pkg:github/elixir-mint/mint\", \"packageName\": \"elixir-mint/mint\", \"programFiles\": [\"lib/mint/http1.ex\"], \"collectionURL\": \"https://github.com\", \"defaultStatus\": \"unaffected\", \"programRoutines\": [{\"name\": \"\u0027Elixir.Mint.HTTP1\u0027:decode_body/5\"}]}], \"references\": [{\"url\": \"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/security/advisories/GHSA-x3x7-96vm-6h2w\", \"tags\": [\"vendor-advisory\", \"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59249.html\", \"tags\": [\"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59249\", \"tags\": [\"related\"]}, {\"url\": \"https://github.com/elixir-mint/mint/commit/fc7d16538db7e40b56ed489f08683225cb0197fa\", \"tags\": [\"patch\"]}], \"x_generator\": {\"engine\": \"cvelib 1.8.0\"}, \"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response smuggling) vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on the same pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.\\n\\nThe Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5 function in lib/mint/http1.ex parses the chunk-size line of a Transfer-Encoding: chunked response with Integer.parse(data, 16). RFC 7230 defines chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG and forbids any sign prefix, but Integer.parse/2 accepts an optional leading + or -. A chunk-size line of +5 is accepted as a five-byte chunk; lines of +0 and -0 are accepted as the terminating zero-length chunk and end the message body early.\\n\\nAn RFC-strict intermediary in the response path rejects these forms, so the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on where one response ends and the next begins. On a pooled keep-alive connection, an attacker-influenced origin can inject bytes that the client attributes to the next legitimate response on the same connection, poisoning the response queue and corrupting the responses returned to unrelated in-flight requests.\\n\\nThis issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.3.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eInconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests (HTTP response smuggling) vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on the same pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe \u003ctt\u003eMint.HTTP1.decode_body/5\u003c/tt\u003e function in \u003ctt\u003elib/mint/http1.ex\u003c/tt\u003e parses the chunk-size line of a \u003ctt\u003eTransfer-Encoding: chunked\u003c/tt\u003e response with \u003ctt\u003eInteger.parse(data, 16)\u003c/tt\u003e. RFC 7230 defines \u003ctt\u003echunk-size = 1*HEXDIG\u003c/tt\u003e and forbids any sign prefix, but \u003ctt\u003eInteger.parse/2\u003c/tt\u003e accepts an optional leading \u003ctt\u003e+\u003c/tt\u003e or \u003ctt\u003e-\u003c/tt\u003e. A chunk-size line of \u003ctt\u003e+5\u003c/tt\u003e is accepted as a five-byte chunk; lines of \u003ctt\u003e+0\u003c/tt\u003e and \u003ctt\u003e-0\u003c/tt\u003e are accepted as the terminating zero-length chunk and end the message body early.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eAn RFC-strict intermediary in the response path rejects these forms, so the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on where one response ends and the next begins. On a pooled keep-alive connection, an attacker-influenced origin can inject bytes that the client attributes to the next legitimate response on the same connection, poisoning the response queue and corrupting the responses returned to unrelated in-flight requests.\u003c/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.9.3.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"problemTypes\": [{\"descriptions\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"type\": \"CWE\", \"cweId\": \"CWE-444\", \"description\": \"CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (\u0027HTTP Request/Response Smuggling\u0027)\"}]}], \"configurations\": [{\"lang\": \"en\", \"value\": \"Exploitation requires a deployment topology in which an RFC-strict HTTP/1 intermediary (proxy, load balancer, or WAF) sits between the Mint client and the attacker-influenced origin, and HTTP/1 connections between the client and the intermediary are reused across requests (keep-alive with connection pooling). Mint clients that talk directly to an origin without an intermediary, or that do not reuse connections, are not exploitable for response-queue poisoning even if the vulnerable parsing behavior is present.\", \"supportingMedia\": [{\"type\": \"text/html\", \"value\": \"\u003cp\u003eExploitation requires a deployment topology in which an RFC-strict HTTP/1 intermediary (proxy, load balancer, or WAF) sits between the Mint client and the attacker-influenced origin, and HTTP/1 connections between the client and the intermediary are reused across requests (keep-alive with connection pooling). Mint clients that talk directly to an origin without an intermediary, or that do not reuse connections, are not exploitable for response-queue poisoning even if the vulnerable parsing behavior is present.\u003c/p\u003e\", \"base64\": false}]}], \"cpeApplicability\": [{\"nodes\": [{\"negate\": false, \"cpeMatch\": [{\"criteria\": \"cpe:2.3:a:elixir-mint:mint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*\", \"vulnerable\": true, \"versionEndExcluding\": \"1.9.3\", \"versionStartIncluding\": \"0.1.0\"}], \"operator\": \"OR\"}], \"operator\": \"AND\"}], \"providerMetadata\": {\"orgId\": \"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\", \"shortName\": \"EEF\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-17T10:11:36.783Z\"}}}",
"cveMetadata": "{\"cveId\": \"CVE-2026-59249\", \"state\": \"PUBLISHED\", \"dateUpdated\": \"2026-07-17T10:11:36.783Z\", \"dateReserved\": \"2026-07-04T04:24:03.652Z\", \"assignerOrgId\": \"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db\", \"datePublished\": \"2026-07-16T11:39:29.939Z\", \"assignerShortName\": \"EEF\"}",
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…