CVE-2026-77956 (GCVE-0-2026-77956)
Vulnerability from cvelistv5 – Published: 2026-08-31 00:56 – Updated: 2026-08-31 16:01
VLAI
EPSS
VEX
Title
EEx template evaluation of prompt content in AshAi enables remote code execution
Summary
Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection) vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a remote, unauthenticated client to execute arbitrary Elixir code.
AshAi.Actions.Prompt evaluates prompt content through EEx.eval_string/2. The documented prompt: fn input, context -> ... end form lets the prompt content be built from action arguments, so when a prompt action's text incorporates request data, that attacker-controlled text is compiled and run as an EEx template (Elixir source). Content such as <%= System.cmd(...) %> therefore executes on the server before any model request is made, requiring no authentication beyond reaching a prompt action. The fix stops evaluating function-supplied prompt content as EEx; only statically configured templates are evaluated.
This issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.0.
Severity
SSVC
Exploitation: poc
Automatable: no
Technical Impact: total
CISA Coordinator · CISA-ADP (v2.0.3)
Decision recorded 2026-08-31 16:01 UTC
CWE
- CWE-94 - Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
Assigner
References
4 references
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/security/ad… | vendor-advisoryrelated |
| https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77956.html | related |
| https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77956 | related |
| https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/commit/e994… | patch |
Impacted products
2 products
| Vendor | Product | Version | CPE status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash_ai |
Affected:
0.1.0 , < 1.0.0
(semver)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
||
| ash-project | ash_ai |
Affected:
4aab131d40a0bd5a8cf0b3c4eaaa59d49565f3d1 , < e9948254b5659c1143b73dc2f59f457931e64514
(git)
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-77956",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T16:01:20.485407Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T16:01:41.879Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/security/advisories/GHSA-2g59-hg7m-qc83"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_ai",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_ai",
"product": "ash_ai",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_ai/actions/prompt.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027:build_context/3"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_ai",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_ai",
"product": "ash_ai",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_ai/actions/prompt.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027:build_context/3"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "e9948254b5659c1143b73dc2f59f457931e64514",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4aab131d40a0bd5a8cf0b3c4eaaa59d49565f3d1",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.0.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection) vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a remote, unauthenticated client to execute arbitrary Elixir code.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003eAshAi.Actions.Prompt\u003c/code\u003e evaluates prompt content through \u003ccode\u003eEEx.eval_string/2\u003c/code\u003e. The documented \u003ccode\u003eprompt: fn input, context -\u0026gt; ... end\u003c/code\u003e form lets the prompt content be built from action arguments, so when a \u003ccode\u003eprompt\u003c/code\u003e action\u0027s text incorporates request data, that attacker-controlled text is compiled and run as an EEx template (Elixir source). Content such as \u003ccode\u003e\u0026lt;%= System.cmd(...) %\u0026gt;\u003c/code\u003e therefore executes on the server before any model request is made, requiring no authentication beyond reaching a prompt action. The fix stops evaluating function-supplied prompt content as EEx; only statically configured templates are evaluated.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.0.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection) vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a remote, unauthenticated client to execute arbitrary Elixir code.\n\n`AshAi.Actions.Prompt` evaluates prompt content through `EEx.eval_string/2`. The documented `prompt: fn input, context -\u003e ... end` form lets the prompt content be built from action arguments, so when a `prompt` action\u0027s text incorporates request data, that attacker-controlled text is compiled and run as an EEx template (Elixir source). Content such as `\u003c%= System.cmd(...) %\u003e` therefore executes on the server before any model request is made, requiring no authentication beyond reaching a prompt action. The fix stops evaluating function-supplied prompt content as EEx; only statically configured templates are evaluated.\n\nThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.0."
}
],
"value": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection) vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a remote, unauthenticated client to execute arbitrary Elixir code.\n\nAshAi.Actions.Prompt evaluates prompt content through EEx.eval_string/2. The documented prompt: fn input, context -\u003e ... end form lets the prompt content be built from action arguments, so when a prompt action\u0027s text incorporates request data, that attacker-controlled text is compiled and run as an EEx template (Elixir source). Content such as \u003c%= System.cmd(...) %\u003e therefore executes on the server before any model request is made, requiring no authentication beyond reaching a prompt action. The fix stops evaluating function-supplied prompt content as EEx; only statically configured templates are evaluated.\n\nThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.0."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T15:08:21.204Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/security/advisories/GHSA-2g59-hg7m-qc83"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77956.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77956"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/commit/e9948254b5659c1143b73dc2f59f457931e64514"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "EEx template evaluation of prompt content in AshAi enables remote code execution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-77956",
"datePublished": "2026-08-31T00:56:26.440Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-30T17:30:01.409Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T16:01:41.879Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2",
"vulnerability-lookup:meta": {
"epss": {
"cve": "CVE-2026-77956",
"date": "2026-09-26",
"epss": "0.00282",
"percentile": "0.18531"
},
"nvd": {
"cve": {
"affected": [
{
"affectedData": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_ai",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_ai",
"product": "ash_ai",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_ai/actions/prompt.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027:build_context/3"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_ai",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_ai",
"product": "ash_ai",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_ai/actions/prompt.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027:build_context/3"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "e9948254b5659c1143b73dc2f59f457931e64514",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4aab131d40a0bd5a8cf0b3c4eaaa59d49565f3d1",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db"
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection) vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a remote, unauthenticated client to execute arbitrary Elixir code.\n\nAshAi.Actions.Prompt evaluates prompt content through EEx.eval_string/2. The documented prompt: fn input, context -\u003e ... end form lets the prompt content be built from action arguments, so when a prompt action\u0027s text incorporates request data, that attacker-controlled text is compiled and run as an EEx template (Elixir source). Content such as \u003c%= System.cmd(...) %\u003e therefore executes on the server before any model request is made, requiring no authentication beyond reaching a prompt action. The fix stops evaluating function-supplied prompt content as EEx; only statically configured templates are evaluated.\n\nThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.0."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2026-77956",
"lastModified": "2026-09-01T21:15:00.147",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV40": [
{
"cvssData": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"id": "CVE-2026-77956",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "no"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T16:01:20.485407Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"published": "2026-08-31T01:16:49.563",
"references": [
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77956.html"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/commit/e9948254b5659c1143b73dc2f59f457931e64514"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/security/advisories/GHSA-2g59-hg7m-qc83"
},
{
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77956"
},
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/security/advisories/GHSA-2g59-hg7m-qc83"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-94"
}
],
"source": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
},
"vulnrichment": {
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-77956",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"Automatable": "no"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "total"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-08-31T16:01:20.485407Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T16:01:38.306Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"exploit"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/security/advisories/GHSA-2g59-hg7m-qc83"
}
],
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"collectionURL": "https://repo.hex.pm",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash_ai",
"packageURL": "pkg:hex/ash_ai",
"product": "ash_ai",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_ai/actions/prompt.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027:build_context/3"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "1.0.0",
"status": "affected",
"version": "0.1.0",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
},
{
"collectionURL": "https://github.com",
"cpes": [
"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"
],
"defaultStatus": "unaffected",
"modules": [
"\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027"
],
"packageName": "ash-project/ash_ai",
"packageURL": "pkg:github/ash-project/ash_ai",
"product": "ash_ai",
"programFiles": [
"lib/ash_ai/actions/prompt.ex"
],
"programRoutines": [
{
"name": "\u0027Elixir.AshAi.Actions.Prompt\u0027:build_context/3"
}
],
"repo": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai",
"vendor": "ash-project",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "e9948254b5659c1143b73dc2f59f457931e64514",
"status": "affected",
"version": "4aab131d40a0bd5a8cf0b3c4eaaa59d49565f3d1",
"versionType": "git"
}
]
}
],
"cpeApplicability": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_ai:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.0.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "0.1.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
],
"operator": "AND"
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "finder",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Peter Ullrich"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "Zach Daniel / Ash Project"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "coordinator",
"value": "Jonatan M\u00e4nnchen / EEF"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "\u003cp\u003eImproper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection) vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a remote, unauthenticated client to execute arbitrary Elixir code.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ccode\u003eAshAi.Actions.Prompt\u003c/code\u003e evaluates prompt content through \u003ccode\u003eEEx.eval_string/2\u003c/code\u003e. The documented \u003ccode\u003eprompt: fn input, context -\u0026gt; ... end\u003c/code\u003e form lets the prompt content be built from action arguments, so when a \u003ccode\u003eprompt\u003c/code\u003e action\u0027s text incorporates request data, that attacker-controlled text is compiled and run as an EEx template (Elixir source). Content such as \u003ccode\u003e\u0026lt;%= System.cmd(...) %\u0026gt;\u003c/code\u003e therefore executes on the server before any model request is made, requiring no authentication beyond reaching a prompt action. The fix stops evaluating function-supplied prompt content as EEx; only statically configured templates are evaluated.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.0.\u003c/p\u003e"
},
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/markdown",
"value": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection) vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a remote, unauthenticated client to execute arbitrary Elixir code.\n\n`AshAi.Actions.Prompt` evaluates prompt content through `EEx.eval_string/2`. The documented `prompt: fn input, context -\u003e ... end` form lets the prompt content be built from action arguments, so when a `prompt` action\u0027s text incorporates request data, that attacker-controlled text is compiled and run as an EEx template (Elixir source). Content such as `\u003c%= System.cmd(...) %\u003e` therefore executes on the server before any model request is made, requiring no authentication beyond reaching a prompt action. The fix stops evaluating function-supplied prompt content as EEx; only statically configured templates are evaluated.\n\nThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.0."
}
],
"value": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (Code Injection) vulnerability in ash-project ash_ai allows a remote, unauthenticated client to execute arbitrary Elixir code.\n\nAshAi.Actions.Prompt evaluates prompt content through EEx.eval_string/2. The documented prompt: fn input, context -\u003e ... end form lets the prompt content be built from action arguments, so when a prompt action\u0027s text incorporates request data, that attacker-controlled text is compiled and run as an EEx template (Elixir source). Content such as \u003c%= System.cmd(...) %\u003e therefore executes on the server before any model request is made, requiring no authentication beyond reaching a prompt action. The fix stops evaluating function-supplied prompt content as EEx; only statically configured templates are evaluated.\n\nThis issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.0."
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-242",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-242 Code Injection"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"baseScore": 8.9,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"subIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "HIGH",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-94",
"description": "CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027)",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T15:08:21.204Z",
"orgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"shortName": "EEF"
},
"references": [
{
"tags": [
"vendor-advisory",
"related"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/security/advisories/GHSA-2g59-hg7m-qc83"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-77956.html"
},
{
"tags": [
"related"
],
"url": "https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-77956"
},
{
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/ash-project/ash_ai/commit/e9948254b5659c1143b73dc2f59f457931e64514"
}
],
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
},
"title": "EEx template evaluation of prompt content in AshAi enables remote code execution"
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db",
"assignerShortName": "EEF",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-77956",
"datePublished": "2026-08-31T00:56:26.440Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-08-30T17:30:01.409Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-08-31T16:01:41.879Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…