fkie_cve-2004-2760
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2004-12-31 05:00
Modified
2025-04-03 01:03
Severity ?
Summary
sshd in OpenSSH 3.5p1, when PermitRootLogin is disabled, immediately closes the TCP connection after a root login attempt with the correct password, but leaves the connection open after an attempt with an incorrect password, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the password by observing the connection state, a different vulnerability than CVE-2003-0190. NOTE: it could be argued that in most environments, this does not cross privilege boundaries without requiring leverage of a separate vulnerability.
References
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:openbsd:openssh:3.5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "3FB9B4C7-4235-4388-8E5D-E72ECCC37A7E", vulnerable: true, }, { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:openbsd:openssh:3.5p1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "86ACA0ED-A3D0-48A7-B06F-13709AD23B55", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "sshd in OpenSSH 3.5p1, when PermitRootLogin is disabled, immediately closes the TCP connection after a root login attempt with the correct password, but leaves the connection open after an attempt with an incorrect password, which makes it easier for remote attackers to guess the password by observing the connection state, a different vulnerability than CVE-2003-0190. NOTE: it could be argued that in most environments, this does not cross privilege boundaries without requiring leverage of a separate vulnerability.", }, ], id: "CVE-2004-2760", lastModified: "2025-04-03T01:03:51.193", metrics: { cvssMetricV2: [ { acInsufInfo: false, baseSeverity: "MEDIUM", cvssData: { accessComplexity: "MEDIUM", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "PARTIAL", baseScore: 6.8, confidentialityImpact: "PARTIAL", integrityImpact: "PARTIAL", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 8.6, impactScore: 6.4, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: true, obtainUserPrivilege: false, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", userInteractionRequired: false, }, ], }, published: "2004-12-31T05:00:00.000", references: [ { source: "cve@mitre.org", url: "http://archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de/bugtraq/2004/04/msg00162.html", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4100", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/360198", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de/bugtraq/2004/04/msg00162.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4100", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/360198", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org", vendorComments: [ { comment: "The risks associated with fixing this bug are greater than the low severity security risk. We therefore currently have no plans to fix this flaw in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 which is in maintenance mode.", lastModified: "2008-08-11T00:00:00", organization: "Red Hat", }, ], vulnStatus: "Deferred", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-16", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.