FKIE_CVE-2012-10018

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-10-16 07:15 - Updated: 2024-10-16 16:38
Severity ?
8.3 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Summary
The Mapplic and Mapplic Lite plugins for WordPress are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 6.1, 1.0 respectively. This makes it possible for attackers to forgery requests coming from a vulnerable site's server and ultimately perform an XSS attack if requesting an SVG file.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161919/
security@wordfence.comhttps://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161920/
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2503447
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.mapplic.com/docs/#changelog
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/5aacabb5-94af-485a-af24-e84db3e3726f?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Mapplic and Mapplic Lite plugins for WordPress are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in versions up to, and including 6.1, 1.0 respectively. This makes it possible for attackers to forgery requests coming from a vulnerable site\u0027s server and ultimately perform an XSS attack if requesting an SVG file."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Los complementos Mapplic y Mapplic Lite para WordPress son vulnerables a Server-Side Request Forgery en las versiones 6.1 y 1.0, respectivamente. Esto permite a los atacantes falsificar solicitudes provenientes del servidor de un sitio vulnerable y, en \u00faltima instancia, realizar un ataque XSS si se solicita un archivo SVG."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2012-10018",
  "lastModified": "2024-10-16T16:38:14.557",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 8.3,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 3.7,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2024-10-16T07:15:03.920",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161919/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/161920/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/2503447"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.mapplic.com/docs/#changelog"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/5aacabb5-94af-485a-af24-e84db3e3726f?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-918"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.