fkie_cve-2015-7828
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd
Published
2015-11-10 17:59
Modified
2025-04-12 10:46
Severity ?
Summary
SAP HANA Database 1.00 SPS10 and earlier do not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or have unspecified other impact via a TrexNet packet to the (1) fcopydir, (2) fmkdir, (3) frmdir, (4) getenv, (5) dumpenv, (6) fcopy, (7) fput, (8) fdel, (9) fmove, (10) fget, (11) fappend, (12) fdir, (13) getTraces, (14) kill, (15) pexec, (16) stop, or (17) pythonexec method, aka SAP Security Note 2165583.
References
{ configurations: [ { nodes: [ { cpeMatch: [ { criteria: "cpe:2.3:a:sap:hana:*:sp10:*:*:*:*:*:*", matchCriteriaId: "6E3AEABF-FB14-43B0-9D5D-5A3206F199DD", versionEndIncluding: "1.00", vulnerable: true, }, ], negate: false, operator: "OR", }, ], }, ], cveTags: [], descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "SAP HANA Database 1.00 SPS10 and earlier do not require authentication, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or have unspecified other impact via a TrexNet packet to the (1) fcopydir, (2) fmkdir, (3) frmdir, (4) getenv, (5) dumpenv, (6) fcopy, (7) fput, (8) fdel, (9) fmove, (10) fget, (11) fappend, (12) fdir, (13) getTraces, (14) kill, (15) pexec, (16) stop, or (17) pythonexec method, aka SAP Security Note 2165583.", }, { lang: "es", value: "SAP HANA Database 1.00 SPS10 y anteriores no requiere autenticación, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario o tener otro impacto no especificado a través de un paquete TrexNet al método (1) fcopydir, (2) fmkdir, (3) frmdir, (4) getenv, (5) dumpenv, (6) fcopy, (7) fput, (8) fdel, (9) fmove, (10) fget, (11) fappend, (12) fdir, (13) getTraces, (14) kill, (15) pexec, (16) stop o (17) pythonexec, también conocida como SAP Security Note 2165583.", }, ], id: "CVE-2015-7828", lastModified: "2025-04-12T10:46:40.837", metrics: { cvssMetricV2: [ { acInsufInfo: false, baseSeverity: "HIGH", cvssData: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "COMPLETE", baseScore: 10, confidentialityImpact: "COMPLETE", integrityImpact: "COMPLETE", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 10, impactScore: 10, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", userInteractionRequired: false, }, ], }, published: "2015-11-10T17:59:05.507", references: [ { source: "cve@mitre.org", url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/134281/SAP-HANA-TrexNet-Command-Execution.html", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Nov/36", }, { source: "cve@mitre.org", url: "https://www.onapsis.com/blog/analyzing-sap-security-notes-august-2015-edition", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/134281/SAP-HANA-TrexNet-Command-Execution.html", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Nov/36", }, { source: "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", url: "https://www.onapsis.com/blog/analyzing-sap-security-notes-august-2015-edition", }, ], sourceIdentifier: "cve@mitre.org", vulnStatus: "Deferred", weaknesses: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "CWE-20", }, ], source: "nvd@nist.gov", type: "Primary", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.