FKIE_CVE-2022-22820

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2022-01-20 12:15 - Updated: 2024-11-21 06:47
Severity ?
5.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
Due to the lack of media file checks before rendering, it was possible for an attacker to cause abnormal CPU consumption for message recipient by sending specially crafted gif image in LINE for Windows before 7.4.
References
dl_cve@linecorp.comhttps://hackerone.com/reports/1357400Permissions Required
af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108https://hackerone.com/reports/1357400Permissions Required
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
linecorp line *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:linecorp:line:*:*:*:*:*:windows:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "61717960-C6DB-4540-9202-E2C541770836",
              "versionEndExcluding": "7.4.0",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Due to the lack of media file checks before rendering, it was possible for an attacker to cause abnormal CPU consumption for message recipient by sending specially crafted gif image in LINE for Windows before 7.4."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Debido a una falta de comprobaciones de archivos multimedia antes de la renderizaci\u00f3n, era posible que un atacante causara un consumo anormal de CPU para el destinatario del mensaje mediante el env\u00edo de una imagen gif especialmente dise\u00f1ada en LINE para Windows versiones anteriores a 7.4"
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2022-22820",
  "lastModified": "2024-11-21T06:47:31.007",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV2": [
      {
        "acInsufInfo": false,
        "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
        "cvssData": {
          "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
          "accessVector": "NETWORK",
          "authentication": "NONE",
          "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
          "version": "2.0"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
        "impactScore": 2.9,
        "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
        "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
        "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary",
        "userInteractionRequired": true
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "LOCAL",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 5.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2022-01-20T12:15:08.727",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "dl_cve@linecorp.com",
      "tags": [
        "Permissions Required"
      ],
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1357400"
    },
    {
      "source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
      "tags": [
        "Permissions Required"
      ],
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/1357400"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "dl_cve@linecorp.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Modified",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-20"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.