FKIE_CVE-2024-32638
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-05-02 10:15 - Updated: 2025-07-10 16:00
Severity ?
Summary
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') vulnerability in Apache APISIX when using `forward-auth` plugin.This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.8.0, 3.9.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.1, 3.9.1 or higher, which fixes the issue.
References
| URL | Tags | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| security@apache.org | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
| security@apache.org | https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2 | Mailing List, Third Party Advisory | |
| af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov | Mailing List, Vendor Advisory |
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:3.8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "673953A0-7C5B-460B-9F28-CBD492B537F0",
"vulnerable": true
},
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:apisix:3.9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "79192958-40FE-429C-B251-8A0F71CFEDBB",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests (\u0027HTTP Request Smuggling\u0027)\u00a0vulnerability in Apache APISIX when using `forward-auth` plugin.This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.8.0, 3.9.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 3.8.1, 3.9.1 or higher, which fixes the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de interpretaci\u00f3n inconsistente de solicitudes HTTP (\"contrabando de solicitudes HTTP\") en Apache APISIX cuando se utiliza el complemento `forward-auth`. Este problema afecta a Apache APISIX: desde 3.8.0, 3.9.0. Se recomienda a los usuarios actualizar a la versi\u00f3n 3.8.1, 3.9.1 o superior, lo que soluciona el problema."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-32638",
"lastModified": "2025-07-10T16:00:20.313",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 6.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 3.4,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-05-02T10:15:08.443",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2"
},
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/05/02/2"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/ngvgxllw4zn4hgngkqw2o225kf9wotov"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-444"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-444"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…