FKIE_CVE-2024-36268
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2024-08-02 10:16 - Updated: 2024-11-21 09:21
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
7.6 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
7.6 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
Summary
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Apache InLong.
This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.10.0 through 1.12.0, which could lead to Remote Code Execution. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 1.13.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it.
[1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/10251
References
{
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:apache:inlong:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "60AA3A03-AF35-41BE-8671-5C75CC7C82A2",
"versionEndExcluding": "1.13.0",
"versionStartIncluding": "1.10.0",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Improper Control of Generation of Code (\u0027Code Injection\u0027) vulnerability in Apache InLong.\n\nThis issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.10.0 through 1.12.0, which could lead to Remote Code Execution. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong\u0027s 1.13.0 or cherry-pick [1] to solve it.\n\n[1]\u00a0 https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/10251"
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "Vulnerabilidad de control inadecuado de la generaci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo (\u0027inyecci\u00f3n de c\u00f3digo\u0027) en Apache InLong. Este problema afecta a Apache InLong: desde la versi\u00f3n 1.10.0 hasta la 1.12.0, lo que podr\u00eda provocar la ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo. Se recomienda a los usuarios que actualicen a la versi\u00f3n 1.13.0 de Apache InLong o seleccionen la que m\u00e1s les convenga [1] para resolverlo. [1] https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/10251"
}
],
"id": "CVE-2024-36268",
"lastModified": "2024-11-21T09:21:57.987",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 9.8,
"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 5.9,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
},
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "LOW",
"baseScore": 7.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "LOW",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 4.7,
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-08-02T10:16:00.367",
"references": [
{
"source": "security@apache.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List",
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/1w1yp1bg5sjvn46dszkf00tz1vfs0frc"
},
{
"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/02/5"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "security@apache.org",
"vulnStatus": "Modified",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-94"
}
],
"source": "security@apache.org",
"type": "Secondary"
},
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-94"
}
],
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…