FKIE_CVE-2025-0181

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-02-11 07:15 - Updated: 2025-02-11 07:15
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
The WP Foodbakery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation via account takeover in all versions up to, and including, 4.7. This is due to the plugin not properly validating a user's identity prior to setting the current user and their authentication cookie. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to gain access to a target user's (e.g. administrators) account.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://themeforest.net/item/food-bakery-restaurant-bakery-responsive-wordpress-theme/18970331
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/d722ec8d-bfca-4da1-8eb0-8d33735c5e44?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The WP Foodbakery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation via account takeover in all versions up to, and including, 4.7. This is due to the plugin not properly validating a user\u0027s identity prior to setting the current user and their authentication cookie. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to gain access to a target user\u0027s (e.g. administrators) account."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento WP Foodbakery para WordPress es vulnerable a la escalada de privilegios mediante la apropiaci\u00f3n de cuentas en todas las versiones hasta la 4.7 y incluida. Esto se debe a que el complemento no valida correctamente la identidad de un usuario antes de configurar el usuario actual y su cookie de autenticaci\u00f3n. Esto hace posible que atacantes no autenticados obtengan acceso a la cuenta de un usuario objetivo (por ejemplo, administradores)."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-0181",
  "lastModified": "2025-02-11T07:15:29.827",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-02-11T07:15:29.827",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://themeforest.net/item/food-bakery-restaurant-bakery-responsive-wordpress-theme/18970331"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/d722ec8d-bfca-4da1-8eb0-8d33735c5e44?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-288"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.