FKIE_CVE-2025-32460
Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-09 02:15 - Updated: 2025-04-09 20:02
Severity ?
Summary
GraphicsMagick before 8e56520 has a heap-based buffer over-read in ReadJXLImage in coders/jxl.c, related to an ImportViewPixelArea call.
References
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | Version |
|---|
{
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GraphicsMagick before 8e56520 has a heap-based buffer over-read in ReadJXLImage in coders/jxl.c, related to an ImportViewPixelArea call."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "GraphicsMagick anterior a 8e56520 tiene una sobrelectura de b\u00fafer basada en mont\u00f3n en ReadJXLImage en coders/jxl.c, relacionada con una llamada ImportViewPixelArea."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2025-32460",
"lastModified": "2025-04-09T20:02:41.860",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "LOCAL",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 4.0,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.5,
"impactScore": 1.4,
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
},
"published": "2025-04-09T02:15:15.137",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://foss.heptapod.net/graphicsmagick/graphicsmagick/-/commit/8e56520435df50f618a03f2721a39a70a515f1cb"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/406320404"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"url": "https://tracker.debian.org/news/1636753/accepted-graphicsmagick-14really1345hg17696-1-source-into-unstable/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-125"
}
],
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"type": "Secondary"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…