FKIE_CVE-2025-3921

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-05-07 03:15 - Updated: 2025-05-07 14:13
Severity ?
8.2 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
Summary
The PeproDev Ultimate Profile Solutions plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the handel_ajax_req() function in versions 1.9.1 to 7.5.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary user's metadata which can be leveraged to block an administrator from accessing their site when wp_capabilities is set to 0.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peprodev-ups/tags/7.5.2/login/login.php#L1483
security@wordfence.comhttps://wordpress.org/plugins/peprodev-ups/#developers
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/a881ca02-cef9-4f4b-8a62-e241c4c80004?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The PeproDev Ultimate Profile Solutions plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the handel_ajax_req() function in versions 1.9.1 to 7.5.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary user\u0027s metadata which can be leveraged to block an administrator from accessing their site when wp_capabilities is set to 0."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento PeproDev Ultimate Profile Solutions para WordPress es vulnerable a la modificaci\u00f3n no autorizada de datos debido a la falta de una comprobaci\u00f3n de capacidad en la funci\u00f3n handel_ajax_req() en las versiones 1.9.1 a 7.5.2. Esto permite que atacantes no autenticados actualicen metadatos arbitrarios de usuarios, lo que puede utilizarse para impedir que un administrador acceda a su sitio cuando wp_capabilities est\u00e1 configurado a 0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-3921",
  "lastModified": "2025-05-07T14:13:20.483",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 8.2,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 4.2,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-05-07T03:15:18.573",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/peprodev-ups/tags/7.5.2/login/login.php#L1483"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/peprodev-ups/#developers"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/a881ca02-cef9-4f4b-8a62-e241c4c80004?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-285"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.