FKIE_CVE-2025-39421

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-17 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:17
Summary
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mustafa KUCUK WP Sticky Side Buttons wp-sticky-side-buttons allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Sticky Side Buttons: from n/a through <= 2.1.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "wp-sticky-side-buttons",
          "product": "WP Sticky Side Buttons",
          "vendor": "Mustafa KUCUK",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mustafa KUCUK WP Sticky Side Buttons wp-sticky-side-buttons allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Sticky Side Buttons: from n/a through \u003c= 2.1."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La vulnerabilidad de Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) en Mustafa KUCUK WP Sticky Side Buttons permite XSS almacenado. Este problema afecta a WP Sticky Side Buttons desde n/d hasta la versi\u00f3n 2.1."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-39421",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:17:55.633",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 7.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.7,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-39421",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-04-17T16:05:13.869748Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-04-17T16:15:51.933",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/wp-sticky-side-buttons/vulnerability/wordpress-wp-sticky-side-buttons-plugin-2-1-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…