FKIE_CVE-2025-39426

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-04-17 16:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 09:17
Severity
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in illow illow – Cookies Consent lgpd-compliant-cookie-banner allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects illow – Cookies Consent: from n/a through <= 0.2.0.
References
audit@patchstack.comhttps://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/lgpd-compliant-cookie-banner/vulnerability/wordpress-illow-cookies-consent-plugin-0-2-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "collectionURL": "https://wordpress.org/plugins",
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "packageName": "lgpd-compliant-cookie-banner",
          "product": "illow \u2013 Cookies Consent",
          "vendor": "illow",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "0.2.0",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in illow illow \u2013 Cookies Consent lgpd-compliant-cookie-banner allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects illow \u2013 Cookies Consent: from n/a through \u003c= 0.2.0."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Vulnerabilidad de Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) en illow illow \u2013 Cookies Consent permite Cross-Site Request Forgery. Este problema afecta a illow \u2013 Cookies Consent desde n/d hasta la versi\u00f3n 0.2.0."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-39426",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T09:17:56.123",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2025-39426",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2025-04-17T16:08:27.458700Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-04-17T16:15:52.610",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/Wordpress/Plugin/lgpd-compliant-cookie-banner/vulnerability/wordpress-illow-cookies-consent-plugin-0-2-0-cross-site-request-forgery-csrf-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-352"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.