FKIE_CVE-2025-40910

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-06-27 13:15 - Updated: 2025-06-30 18:38
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Summary
Net::IP::LPM version 1.10 for Perl does not properly consider leading zero characters in IP CIDR address strings, which could allow attackers to bypass access control that is based on IP addresses. Leading zeros are used to indicate octal numbers, which can confuse users who are intentionally using octal notation, as well as users who believe they are using decimal notation.
References
9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441ehttps://blog.urth.org/2021/03/29/security-issues-in-perl-ip-address-distros/
9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441ehttps://metacpan.org/release/TPODER/Net-IP-LPM-1.10/diff/TPODER/Net-IP-LPM-1.09/lib/Net/IP/LPM.pm
9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441ehttps://security.metacpan.org/patches/N/Net-IP-LPM/1.10/CVE-2025-40910-r1.patch
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Net::IP::LPM version 1.10 for Perl does not properly consider leading zero characters in IP CIDR address strings, which could allow attackers to bypass access control that is based on IP addresses.\n\nLeading zeros are used to indicate octal numbers, which can confuse users who are intentionally using octal notation, as well as users who believe they are using decimal notation."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La versi\u00f3n 1.10 de Net::IP::LPM para Perl no considera correctamente los ceros iniciales en las cadenas de direcciones IP CIDR, lo que podr\u00eda permitir a los atacantes eludir el control de acceso basado en direcciones IP. Los ceros iniciales se utilizan para indicar n\u00fameros octales, lo que puede confundir tanto a los usuarios que utilizan la notaci\u00f3n octal intencionalmente como a los que creen que utilizan la notaci\u00f3n decimal."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-40910",
  "lastModified": "2025-06-30T18:38:48.477",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-06-27T13:15:24.667",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
      "url": "https://blog.urth.org/2021/03/29/security-issues-in-perl-ip-address-distros/"
    },
    {
      "source": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
      "url": "https://metacpan.org/release/TPODER/Net-IP-LPM-1.10/diff/TPODER/Net-IP-LPM-1.09/lib/Net/IP/LPM.pm"
    },
    {
      "source": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
      "url": "https://security.metacpan.org/patches/N/Net-IP-LPM/1.10/CVE-2025-40910-r1.patch"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
  "vulnStatus": "Undergoing Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-1287"
        }
      ],
      "source": "9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.