FKIE_CVE-2025-46630

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-05-01 20:15 - Updated: 2025-05-27 14:24
Summary
Improper access controls in the web management portal of the Tenda RX2 Pro 16.03.30.14 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to enable 'ate' (a remote system management binary) by sending a /goform/ate web request.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
tenda rx2_pro_firmware 16.03.30.14
tenda rx2_pro -

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:tenda:rx2_pro_firmware:16.03.30.14:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "A6C6559F-BD91-44DF-BA9E-2F55C714009C",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        },
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:tenda:rx2_pro:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "E95CB932-CDB6-4E44-A868-5DEEAD982F7C",
              "vulnerable": false
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ],
      "operator": "AND"
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Improper access controls in the web management portal of the Tenda RX2 Pro 16.03.30.14 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to enable \u0027ate\u0027 (a remote system management binary) by sending a /goform/ate web request."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Los controles de acceso inadecuados en el portal de administraci\u00f3n web de Tenda RX2 Pro 16.03.30.14 permiten que un atacante remoto no autenticado habilite \u0027ate\u0027 (un binario de administraci\u00f3n del sistema remoto) enviando una solicitud web /goform/ate."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-46630",
  "lastModified": "2025-05-27T14:24:30.130",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 2.5,
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-05-01T20:15:38.803",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory",
        "Exploit"
      ],
      "url": "https://blog.uturn.dev/#/writeups/iot-village/tenda-rx2pro/README?id=cve-2025-46630-enable-ate-unauthenticated-through-httpd"
    },
    {
      "source": "cve@mitre.org",
      "tags": [
        "Product"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.tendacn.com/us/default.html"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-287"
        }
      ],
      "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…