FKIE_CVE-2025-48137

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-05-16 16:15 - Updated: 2025-05-30 14:35
Severity ?
8.5 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in proxymis Interview allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Interview: from n/a through 1.01.
References
audit@patchstack.comhttps://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/interview/vulnerability/wordpress-interview-1-01-sql-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cveThird Party Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
proxymis interview *
To clipboard 

{
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:proxymis:interview:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "80CA451F-99FA-4F33-82E6-D503FE919D18",
              "versionEndIncluding": "1.01",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command (\u0027SQL Injection\u0027) vulnerability in proxymis Interview allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Interview: from n/a through 1.01."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La vulnerabilidad de neutralizaci\u00f3n incorrecta de elementos especiales utilizados en un comando SQL (\u0027Inyecci\u00f3n SQL\u0027) en proxymis Interview permite la inyecci\u00f3n SQL. Este problema afecta a Interview desde n/d hasta la versi\u00f3n 1.01."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-48137",
  "lastModified": "2025-05-30T14:35:13.523",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 8.5,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.1,
        "impactScore": 4.7,
        "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      },
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-05-16T16:15:45.653",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "tags": [
        "Third Party Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/interview/vulnerability/wordpress-interview-1-01-sql-injection-vulnerability?_s_id=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "audit@patchstack.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "audit@patchstack.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    },
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-89"
        }
      ],
      "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.