FKIE_CVE-2025-54575

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-07-30 20:15 - Updated: 2025-07-31 18:42
Summary
ImageSharp is a 2D graphics library. In versions below 2.1.11 and 3.0.0 through 3.1.10, a specially crafted GIF file containing a malformed comment extension block (with a missing block terminator) can cause the ImageSharp GIF decoder to enter an infinite loop while attempting to skip the block. This leads to a denial of service. Applications processing untrusted GIF input should upgrade to a patched version. This issue is fixed in versions 2.1.11 and 3.1.11.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "ImageSharp is a 2D graphics library. In versions below 2.1.11 and 3.0.0 through 3.1.10, a specially crafted GIF file containing a malformed comment extension block (with a missing block terminator) can cause the ImageSharp GIF decoder to enter an infinite loop while attempting to skip the block. This leads to a denial of service. Applications processing untrusted GIF input should upgrade to a patched version. This issue is fixed in versions 2.1.11 and 3.1.11."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "ImageSharp es una librer\u00eda de gr\u00e1ficos 2D. En versiones anteriores a la 2.1.11 y de la 3.0.0 a la 3.1.10, un archivo GIF especialmente manipulado que contiene un bloque de extensi\u00f3n de comentario mal formado (sin un terminador de bloque) puede provocar que el decodificador GIF de ImageSharp entre en un bucle infinito al intentar omitir el bloque. Esto provoca una denegaci\u00f3n de servicio. Las aplicaciones que procesan entradas GIF no confiables deben actualizarse a una versi\u00f3n parcheada. Este problema est\u00e1 corregido en las versiones 2.1.11 y 3.1.11."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-54575",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-31T18:42:37.870",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "LOW",
          "baseScore": 5.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-30T20:15:37.207",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/commit/55e49262df9a057dff9b7807ed1b7bdb49187c3f"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/commit/833f3ceec35af6b775950e06f03b934546cefbf6"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/issues/2953"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/SixLabors/ImageSharp/security/advisories/GHSA-rxmq-m78w-7wmc"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-400"
        },
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-770"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…