FKIE_CVE-2025-7692

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-07-22 10:15 - Updated: 2025-07-22 13:05
Severity ?
8.1 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
The Orion Login with SMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to the olws_handle_verify_phone() function not utilizing a strong enough OTP value, exposing the hash needed to generate the OTP value, and no restrictions on the number of attempts to submit the code. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as other users, including administrators, if they have access to their phone number.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://wordpress.org/plugins/orion-login-with-sms/
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/31a47cbd-c19b-4ac3-87ed-2d4c5c0e9cb7?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Orion Login with SMS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to the olws_handle_verify_phone() function not utilizing a strong enough OTP value, exposing the hash needed to generate the OTP value, and no restrictions on the number of attempts to submit the code. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to log in as other users, including administrators, if they have access to their phone number."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El complemento Orion Login with SMS para WordPress es vulnerable a la omisi\u00f3n de autenticaci\u00f3n en todas las versiones hasta la 1.0.5 incluida. Esto se debe a que la funci\u00f3n olws_handle_verify_phone() no utiliza un valor OTP suficientemente seguro, lo que expone el hash necesario para generarlo y no hay restricciones en el n\u00famero de intentos para enviar el c\u00f3digo. Esto permite que atacantes no autenticados inicien sesi\u00f3n como otros usuarios, incluidos administradores, si tienen acceso a su n\u00famero de tel\u00e9fono."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-7692",
  "lastModified": "2025-07-22T13:05:40.573",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.1,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-07-22T10:15:26.357",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://wordpress.org/plugins/orion-login-with-sms/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/31a47cbd-c19b-4ac3-87ed-2d4c5c0e9cb7?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-288"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.