FKIE_CVE-2025-8595

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2025-08-06 03:15 - Updated: 2025-08-06 20:23
Severity ?
4.3 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Summary
The Zakra theme for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized data modification due to a missing capability check on the welcome_notice_import_handler() function in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.5. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to import demo settings.
References
security@wordfence.comhttps://research.cleantalk.org/cve-2025-8595/
security@wordfence.comhttps://themes.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=&sfph_mail=&reponame=&new=281307%40zakra%2F4.1.6&old=276128%40zakra%2F4.1.5
security@wordfence.comhttps://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/4da012dc-7e58-479a-813e-762eb28297bf?source=cve
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The Zakra theme for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized data modification due to a missing capability check on the welcome_notice_import_handler() function in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.5. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to import demo settings."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "El tema Zakra para WordPress es vulnerable a la modificaci\u00f3n no autorizada de datos debido a la falta de una comprobaci\u00f3n de capacidad en la funci\u00f3n welcome_notice_import_handler() en todas las versiones hasta la 4.1.5 incluida. Esto permite que atacantes autenticados, con acceso de suscriptor o superior, importen la configuraci\u00f3n de la demo."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2025-8595",
  "lastModified": "2025-08-06T20:23:37.600",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 4.3,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "LOW",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 1.4,
        "source": "security@wordfence.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2025-08-06T03:15:27.900",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://research.cleantalk.org/cve-2025-8595/"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=\u0026sfph_mail=\u0026reponame=\u0026new=281307%40zakra%2F4.1.6\u0026old=276128%40zakra%2F4.1.5"
    },
    {
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "url": "https://www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/4da012dc-7e58-479a-813e-762eb28297bf?source=cve"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@wordfence.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-862"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@wordfence.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.