FKIE_CVE-2026-0507

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-01-13 02:15 - Updated: 2026-04-15 00:35
Severity
8.4 (High) - CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
Due to an OS Command Injection vulnerability in SAP Application Server for ABAP and SAP NetWeaver RFCSDK, an authenticated attacker with administrative access and adjacent network access could upload specially crafted content to the server. If processed by the application, this content enables execution of arbitrary operating system commands. Successful exploitation could lead to full compromise of the system�s confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
References
cna@sap.comhttps://me.sap.com/notes/3675151
cna@sap.comhttps://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Due to an OS Command Injection vulnerability in SAP Application Server for ABAP and SAP NetWeaver RFCSDK, an authenticated attacker with administrative access and adjacent network access could upload specially crafted content to the server. If processed by the application, this content enables execution of arbitrary operating system commands. Successful exploitation could lead to full compromise of the system\ufffds confidentiality, integrity, and availability."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Debido a una vulnerabilidad de inyecci\u00f3n de comandos del sistema operativo en SAP Servidor de aplicaciones para ABAP y SAP NetWeaver RFCSDK, un atacante autenticado con acceso administrativo y acceso a la red adyacente podr\u00eda cargar contenido especialmente dise\u00f1ado al servidor. Si es procesado por la aplicaci\u00f3n, este contenido permite la ejecuci\u00f3n de comandos arbitrarios del sistema operativo. La explotaci\u00f3n exitosa podr\u00eda llevar a un compromiso total de la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad del sistema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-0507",
  "lastModified": "2026-04-15T00:35:42.020",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 8.4,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "HIGH",
          "scope": "CHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 1.7,
        "impactScore": 6.0,
        "source": "cna@sap.com",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-01-13T02:15:53.427",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "url": "https://me.sap.com/notes/3675151"
    },
    {
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "url": "https://url.sap/sapsecuritypatchday"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "cna@sap.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Deferred",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-78"
        }
      ],
      "source": "cna@sap.com",
      "type": "Primary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.