FKIE_CVE-2026-24932

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-03 03:15 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:23
Severity
5.9 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Summary
The DDNS update function in ADM fails to properly validate the hostname of the DDNS server's TLS/SSL certificate. Although the connection uses HTTPS, an improper validated TLS/SSL certificates allows a remote attacker can intercept the communication to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, which may obtain the sensitive information of DDNS updating process, including the user's account email, MD5 hashed password, and device serial number.This issue affects ADM: from 4.1.0 through 4.3.3.ROF1, from 5.0.0 through 5.1.1.RCI1.
References
security@asustor.comhttps://www.asustor.com/security/security_advisory_detail?id=50Vendor Advisory
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
asustor data_master *
asustor data_master *
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
          "platforms": [
            "Linux",
            "x86",
            "64 bit",
            "ARM"
          ],
          "product": "ADM",
          "vendor": "ASUSTOR",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "4.3.3.ROF1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "4.1.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            },
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "5.1.1.RCI1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "5.0.0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@asustor.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:asustor:data_master:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "662E4EA5-0C53-4669-947E-705E5E076B10",
              "versionEndIncluding": "4.3.3.rof1",
              "versionStartIncluding": "4.1.0.rhu2",
              "vulnerable": true
            },
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:asustor:data_master:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "7FC466AD-33C6-4F5C-A679-C5100B0B9B32",
              "versionEndExcluding": "5.1.2.re51",
              "versionStartIncluding": "5.0.0.ra82",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "The DDNS update function in ADM fails to properly validate the hostname of the DDNS server\u0027s TLS/SSL certificate. Although the connection uses HTTPS, an improper validated TLS/SSL certificates allows a remote attacker can intercept the communication to perform a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack, which may obtain the sensitive information of DDNS updating process, including the user\u0027s account email, MD5 hashed password, and device serial number.This issue affects ADM: from 4.1.0 through 4.3.3.ROF1, from 5.0.0 through 5.1.1.RCI1."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "La funci\u00f3n de actualizaci\u00f3n de DDNS en ADM no valida correctamente el nombre de host del certificado TLS/SSL del servidor DDNS. Aunque la conexi\u00f3n utiliza HTTPS, un certificado TLS/SSL incorrectamente validado permite a un atacante remoto interceptar la comunicaci\u00f3n para realizar un ataque man-in-the-middle (MitM), lo que puede obtener la informaci\u00f3n sensible del proceso de actualizaci\u00f3n de DDNS, incluyendo el correo electr\u00f3nico de la cuenta del usuario, la contrase\u00f1a con hash MD5 y el n\u00famero de serie del dispositivo. Este problema afecta a ADM: desde 4.1.0 hasta 4.3.3.ROF1, desde 5.0.0 hasta 5.1.1.RCI1."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-24932",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:23:50.053",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "HIGH",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 5.9,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.2,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "nvd@nist.gov",
        "type": "Primary"
      }
    ],
    "cvssMetricV40": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackRequirements": "PRESENT",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "baseScore": 8.9,
          "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
          "confidentialityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "exploitMaturity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "integrityRequirement": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackComplexity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackRequirements": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedAttackVector": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedPrivilegesRequired": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedSubIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedUserInteraction": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "subConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
          "version": "4.0",
          "vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnConfidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "vulnIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
          "vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
        },
        "source": "security@asustor.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-24932",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-02-03T15:26:09.063895Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-03T03:15:53.080",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security@asustor.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://www.asustor.com/security/security_advisory_detail?id=50"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security@asustor.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-295"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security@asustor.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.