FKIE_CVE-2026-27966

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-02-26 02:16 - Updated: 2026-02-27 15:16
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Summary
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to version 1.8.0, the CSV Agent node in Langflow hardcodes `allow_dangerous_code=True`, which automatically exposes LangChain’s Python REPL tool (`python_repl_ast`). As a result, an attacker can execute arbitrary Python and OS commands on the server via prompt injection, leading to full Remote Code Execution (RCE). Version 1.8.0 fixes the issue.
References
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/d8c6480daa17b2f2af0b5470cdf5c3d28dc9e508
security-advisories@github.comhttps://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-3645-fxcv-hqr4
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
To clipboard 

{
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to version 1.8.0, the CSV Agent node in Langflow hardcodes `allow_dangerous_code=True`, which automatically exposes LangChain\u2019s Python REPL tool (`python_repl_ast`). As a result, an attacker can execute arbitrary Python and OS commands on the server via prompt injection, leading to full Remote Code Execution (RCE). Version 1.8.0 fixes the issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "Langflow es una herramienta para construir y desplegar agentes y flujos de trabajo impulsados por IA. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 1.8.0, el nodo CSV Agent en Langflow codifica de forma r\u00edgida \u0027allow_dangerous_code=True\u0027, lo que expone autom\u00e1ticamente la herramienta Python REPL de LangChain (\u0027python_repl_ast\u0027). Como resultado, un atacante puede ejecutar comandos arbitrarios de Python y del sistema operativo en el servidor a trav\u00e9s de inyecci\u00f3n de prompts, lo que lleva a una ejecuci\u00f3n remota de c\u00f3digo (RCE) completa. La versi\u00f3n 1.8.0 soluciona el problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-27966",
  "lastModified": "2026-02-27T15:16:30.373",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 9.8,
          "baseSeverity": "CRITICAL",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
          "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
        "impactScore": 5.9,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-02-26T02:16:23.833",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/d8c6480daa17b2f2af0b5470cdf5c3d28dc9e508"
    },
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "url": "https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-3645-fxcv-hqr4"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-94"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.