FKIE_CVE-2026-32697

Vulnerability from fkie_nvd - Published: 2026-03-20 00:16 - Updated: 2026-06-17 10:36
Summary
SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 8.9.3, the `RecordHandler::getRecord()` method retrieves any record by module and ID without checking the current user's ACL view permission. The companion `saveRecord()` method correctly checks `$bean->ACLAccess('save')`, but `getRecord()` skips the equivalent `ACLAccess('view')` check. Version 8.9.3 patches the issue.
Impacted products
Vendor Product Version
suitecrm suitecrm *

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "affectedData": [
        {
          "product": "SuiteCRM-Core",
          "vendor": "SuiteCRM",
          "versions": [
            {
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "\u003c 8.9.3"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com"
    }
  ],
  "configurations": [
    {
      "nodes": [
        {
          "cpeMatch": [
            {
              "criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:suitecrm:suitecrm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
              "matchCriteriaId": "CD824E64-58E0-472C-84CB-6729B4B791DF",
              "versionEndExcluding": "8.9.3",
              "vulnerable": true
            }
          ],
          "negate": false,
          "operator": "OR"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "cveTags": [],
  "descriptions": [
    {
      "lang": "en",
      "value": "SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Prior to versions 8.9.3, the `RecordHandler::getRecord()` method retrieves any record by module and ID without checking the current user\u0027s ACL view permission. The companion `saveRecord()` method correctly checks `$bean-\u003eACLAccess(\u0027save\u0027)`, but `getRecord()` skips the equivalent `ACLAccess(\u0027view\u0027)` check. Version 8.9.3 patches the issue."
    },
    {
      "lang": "es",
      "value": "SuiteCRM es una aplicaci\u00f3n de software de gesti\u00f3n de relaciones con los clientes (CRM) de c\u00f3digo abierto y preparada para uso empresarial. Antes de la versi\u00f3n 8.9.3, el m\u00e9todo `RecordHandler::getRecord()` recuperaba cualquier registro por m\u00f3dulo e ID sin comprobar el permiso de visualizaci\u00f3n de la lista de controles de acceso (ACL) del usuario actual. El m\u00e9todo complementario `saveRecord()` comprueba correctamente `$bean-\u0026gt;ACLAccess(\u201csave\u201d)`, pero `getRecord()` omite la comprobaci\u00f3n equivalente `ACLAccess(\u201cview\u201d)`. La versi\u00f3n 8.9.3 corrige este problema."
    }
  ],
  "id": "CVE-2026-32697",
  "lastModified": "2026-06-17T10:36:13.560",
  "metrics": {
    "cvssMetricV31": [
      {
        "cvssData": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
          "version": "3.1"
        },
        "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
        "impactScore": 3.6,
        "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "type": "Secondary"
      }
    ],
    "ssvcV203": [
      {
        "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
        "ssvcData": {
          "id": "CVE-2026-32697",
          "options": [
            {
              "exploitation": "none"
            },
            {
              "automatable": "no"
            },
            {
              "technicalImpact": "partial"
            }
          ],
          "role": "CISA Coordinator",
          "timestamp": "2026-03-20T20:04:08.531655Z",
          "version": "2.0.3"
        }
      }
    ]
  },
  "published": "2026-03-20T00:16:16.600",
  "references": [
    {
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "tags": [
        "Vendor Advisory"
      ],
      "url": "https://github.com/SuiteCRM/SuiteCRM-Core/security/advisories/GHSA-9p9g-224x-6rmm"
    }
  ],
  "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com",
  "vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
  "weaknesses": [
    {
      "description": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "CWE-639"
        }
      ],
      "source": "security-advisories@github.com",
      "type": "Secondary"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…